PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLFIX vs. MEIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLFIX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund (MLFIX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLFIX achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly higher than MEIKX's 4.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLFIX having a 10.57% annualized return and MEIKX not far behind at 10.06%.


MLFIX

1D
0.36%
1M
3.15%
YTD
8.82%
6M
9.41%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
10.57%

MEIKX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.43%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.90%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLFIX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLFIX
MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund
8.82%15.08%12.35%16.29%-15.32%18.94%13.13%26.08%-7.51%20.79%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.52%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MLFIX and MEIKX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.90

The correlation between MLFIX and MEIKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLFIX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLFIX
MLFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MLFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MLFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLFIX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund (MLFIX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLFIXMEIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.23

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.98

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

6.87

+4.60

MLFIX vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLFIX and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLFIXMEIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.29

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.57

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.61

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.40

+0.08

Drawdowns

MLFIX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLFIX drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, roughly equal to the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLFIX and MEIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLFIXMEIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.99%

-56.81%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-6.76%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.76%

-13.15%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-17.50%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.66%

-36.68%

+5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-9.45%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.95%

-0.26%

Volatility

MLFIX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund (MLFIX) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 2.35%. This indicates that MLFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLFIXMEIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

2.35%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

7.75%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.12%

10.37%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

13.91%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

16.55%

-2.61%

MLFIX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLFIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLFIX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

MLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, less than MEIKX's 9.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.50%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
MLFIX
MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund
7.15%7.79%5.41%3.58%6.61%8.92%3.07%5.79%6.06%3.56%6.91%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLFIX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLFIX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to MEIKX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLFIX dropped -54.99% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.

MLFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLFIX and MEIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer