MLFIX vs. FIKFX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund (MLFIX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX).
MLFIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 28, 2005. FIKFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009.
Performance
MLFIX vs. FIKFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLFIX vs. FIKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLFIX MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund | -2.51% | 15.08% | 12.35% | 16.29% | -15.32% | 18.94% | 13.13% | 26.08% | -7.51% | 20.79% |
FIKFX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class | -0.78% | 9.23% | 4.96% | 8.28% | -11.09% | 2.79% | 8.54% | 10.59% | -0.76% | 6.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLFIX achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly lower than FIKFX's -0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MLFIX has outperformed FIKFX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while FIKFX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.85% annualized return.
MLFIX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 12.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
FIKFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 6.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLFIX vs. FIKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLFIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FIKFX's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MLFIX vs. FIKFX — Risk / Return Rank
MLFIX
FIKFX
MLFIX vs. FIKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund (MLFIX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLFIX | FIKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.51 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 2.11 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.99 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 8.39 | -3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLFIX | FIKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.51 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.52 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.88 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.95 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLFIX and FIKFX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLFIX vs. FIKFX - Dividend Comparison
MLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, more than FIKFX's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLFIX MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund | 7.99% | 7.79% | 5.41% | 3.58% | 6.61% | 8.92% | 3.07% | 5.79% | 6.06% | 3.56% | 6.91% | 2.20% |
FIKFX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class | 3.44% | 3.40% | 3.13% | 2.85% | 3.06% | 2.04% | 2.18% | 7.27% | 2.94% | 1.89% | 1.65% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
MLFIX vs. FIKFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLFIX drawdown since its inception was -54.99%, which is greater than FIKFX's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLFIX and FIKFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLFIX | FIKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.99% | -15.03% | -39.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -3.32% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.37% | -15.03% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.66% | -15.03% | -16.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | -3.09% | -4.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -1.73% | -5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 0.79% | +1.26% |
Volatility
MLFIX vs. FIKFX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund (MLFIX) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX) at 1.87%. This indicates that MLFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLFIX | FIKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 1.87% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.81% | 2.76% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 4.34% | +8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 5.06% | +7.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 4.39% | +9.53% |