MLDR vs. GBIL

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

MLDR (Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past year, MLDR returned 2.21% vs 3.82% for GBIL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.

Performance

MLDR vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (MLDR) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLDR achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.65% return.

MLDR

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: -0.47%
• 1Y: 2.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 1.68%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 4.59%
• 5Y*: 3.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLDR vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MLDR Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	-0.27%	7.20%	-3.31%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	1.65%	4.12%	1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MLDR and GBIL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.23

Return for Risk

MLDR vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLDR

MLDR Risk / Return Rank: 18
MLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 18

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLDR vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (MLDR) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLDR	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	16.89	-16.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	108.54	-107.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	47.91	-46.81
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	191.73	-191.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.84	1,686.86	-1,685.03

MLDR vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the GBIL Sharpe Ratio of 16.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLDR and GBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLDR vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLDR drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLDR and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLDR	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-0.76%	-3.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.26%	-0.02%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	0.00%	-1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-0.04%	-1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	0.00%	+1.22%

Volatility

MLDR vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (MLDR) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that MLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLDR	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	0.05%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	0.14%	+2.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	0.23%	+3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.18%	0.58%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.18%	0.47%	+3.71%

MLDR vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MLDR and GBIL have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MLDR vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

MLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, which matches GBIL's 3.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.73%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%
MLDR Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	3.76%	3.57%	1.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLDR and GBIL in my portfolio?

MLDR and GBIL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLDR or GBIL?

MLDR has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to GBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLDR dropped -4.55% vs GBIL's -0.76%.

Which ETF is better, MLDR or GBIL?

On 1-year performance, GBIL leads with 3.82% vs 2.21% for MLDR. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLDR or GBIL?

Over the 1-year period, GBIL has performed better with a 3.82% return vs 2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLDR or GBIL?

MLDR and GBIL have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLDR or GBIL?

MLDR has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 3.73% for GBIL.

What is the main difference between MLDR and GBIL?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Goldman Sachs.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.