MLAAX vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
MLAAX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000.
Performance
MLAAX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLAAX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | -12.29% | 14.20% | 28.95% | 43.10% | -31.51% | 25.00% | 36.95% | 33.18% | 3.81% | 32.19% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | -3.67% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLAAX achieves a -12.29% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's -3.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MLAAX has outperformed IVV with an annualized return of 15.03%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively lower 14.11% annualized return.
MLAAX
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- -12.29%
- 6M
- -12.72%
- 1Y
- 8.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLAAX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLAAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLAAX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
MLAAX
IVV
MLAAX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLAAX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 1.00 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 1.52 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 1.54 | -1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | 7.28 | -6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLAAX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 1.00 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.71 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.78 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.42 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLAAX and IVV is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLAAX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
MLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.79%, more than IVV's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | 27.79% | 24.37% | 22.54% | 10.59% | 14.95% | 26.64% | 5.40% | 11.55% | 23.59% | 17.20% | 13.18% | 13.61% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.22% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Drawdowns
MLAAX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLAAX drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAAX and IVV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLAAX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -55.25% | -27.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -12.06% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -24.53% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.36% | -33.90% | -5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.81% | -5.57% | -15.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.96% | -10.84% | -28.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 2.55% | +3.82% |
Volatility
MLAAX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 5.34%. This indicates that MLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLAAX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 5.34% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | 9.47% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.97% | 18.31% | +4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 16.89% | +8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.66% | 18.03% | +7.63% |