PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKUW.L vs. E127.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MKUW.L vs. E127.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MKUW.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MKUW.L is traded in USD, while E127.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the E127.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKUW.L achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than E127.L's 16.04% return.


MKUW.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-2.04%
6M
1.18%
YTD
0.15%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
7.89%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*

E127.L

1D
-2.15%
1M
-8.90%
6M
10.42%
YTD
16.04%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKUW.L vs. E127.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MKUW.L
Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.15%25.35%9.15%-8.87%5.99%28.57%15.27%
E127.L
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist
16.04%34.89%7.57%8.20%-19.65%-2.76%40.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MKUW.L and E127.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2020

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKUW.L vs. E127.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKUW.L
MKUW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MKUW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

E127.L
E127.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
E127.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
E127.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
E127.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
E127.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
E127.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKUW.L vs. E127.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MKUW.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MKUW.LE127.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.27

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

2.46

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.05

7.77

-6.72

MKUW.L vs. E127.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKUW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the E127.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKUW.L and E127.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MKUW.L vs. E127.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKUW.L drawdown since its inception was -37.76%, smaller than the maximum E127.L drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKUW.L and E127.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MKUW.LE127.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.76%

-39.93%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-12.84%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.16%

-16.66%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.13%

-34.73%

+9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-11.11%

+7.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-15.54%

+6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

4.07%

-0.81%

Volatility

MKUW.L vs. E127.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MKUW.L) is 1.71%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L) has a volatility of 9.10%. This indicates that MKUW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E127.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MKUW.LE127.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

9.10%

-7.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

19.31%

-11.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

21.43%

-11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

19.20%

-6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

19.02%

-2.53%

MKUW.L vs. E127.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MKUW.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than E127.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

MKUW.L vs. E127.L - Dividend Comparison

MKUW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while E127.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
E127.L
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist
1.86%2.16%3.35%3.76%2.34%1.64%1.70%
MKUW.L
Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MKUW.L and E127.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, E127.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

E127.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MKUW.L.

MKUW.L tracks MSCI Kuwait 20/35 Index, while E127.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MKUW.L and 0.14% for E127.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKUW.L and E127.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer