PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKUW.L achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than FOOD.L's 4.32% return.


MKUW.L

1D
1.09%
1M
-1.83%
6M
1.55%
YTD
0.89%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*

FOOD.L

1D
0.25%
1M
1.57%
6M
-0.79%
YTD
4.32%
1Y
-3.28%
3Y*
-3.92%
5Y*
-9.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MKUW.L
Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.89%25.35%9.15%-8.87%5.99%28.57%3.26%
FOOD.L
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD
4.32%-2.89%-7.32%-1.58%-26.82%1.07%11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MKUW.L and FOOD.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020

0.22

The correlation between MKUW.L and FOOD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKUW.L
MKUW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MKUW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FOOD.L
FOOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FOOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FOOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MKUW.LFOOD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.99

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

-0.14

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.63

-0.27

+1.89

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKUW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the FOOD.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKUW.L and FOOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKUW.L drawdown since its inception was -37.76%, smaller than the maximum FOOD.L drawdown of -47.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKUW.L and FOOD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MKUW.LFOOD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.76%

-47.70%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-16.06%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.16%

-24.15%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.13%

-47.70%

+22.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-40.08%

+37.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-28.63%

+19.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

8.64%

-5.40%

Volatility

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L) is 2.12%, while Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that MKUW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MKUW.LFOOD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

4.65%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

12.11%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

15.77%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

18.70%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

18.20%

-1.70%

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MKUW.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FOOD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MKUW.L vs. FOOD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MKUW.L nor FOOD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MKUW.L and FOOD.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FOOD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FOOD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MKUW.L.

MKUW.L tracks Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc, while FOOD.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MKUW.L and 0.45% for FOOD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKUW.L and FOOD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer