MKS.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Marks and Spencer Group plc (MKS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
MKS.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MKS.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKS.L Marks and Spencer Group plc | 5.91% | -11.20% | 39.13% | 121.79% | -46.72% | 69.77% | -36.16% | -4.79% | -16.37% | -5.11% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -2.07% | 9.43% | 27.16% | 20.01% | -8.44% | 30.01% | 14.85% | 26.37% | 1.16% | 11.24% |
Different Trading Currencies
MKS.L is traded in GBp, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKS.L achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MKS.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 1.51%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.
MKS.L
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- 5.91%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- -0.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.92%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKS.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MKS.L
VOO
MKS.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marks and Spencer Group plc (MKS.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MKS.L | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | 0.79 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 1.22 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.19 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 1.30 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 5.24 | -5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MKS.L | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 0.79 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.81 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.82 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.90 | -0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between MKS.L and VOO is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MKS.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MKS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKS.L Marks and Spencer Group plc | 1.09% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.15% | 7.51% | 5.90% | 6.61% | 4.04% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
MKS.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKS.L drawdown since its inception was -80.60%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKS.L and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKS.L | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.60% | -33.99% | -46.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.78% | -11.98% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.72% | -24.52% | -39.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.79% | -33.99% | -40.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.35% | -5.55% | -12.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.75% | -3.72% | -27.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.88% | 2.55% | +10.33% |
Volatility
MKS.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Marks and Spencer Group plc (MKS.L) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.52%. This indicates that MKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MKS.L | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | 4.52% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.49% | 9.42% | +10.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.54% | 18.52% | +9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 15.81% | +17.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.73% | 18.11% | +18.62% |