MKOR vs. GSG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MKOR (Matthews Korea Active ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MKOR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. MKOR is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, MKOR returned 191.49% vs 51.06% for GSG. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MKOR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.

Performance

MKOR vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKOR achieves a 98.81% return, which is significantly higher than GSG's 41.50% return.

MKOR

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 19.11%
• YTD: 98.81%
• 6M: 111.44%
• 1Y: 191.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSG

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 41.50%
• 6M: 40.89%
• 1Y: 51.06%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 15.80%
• 10Y*: 7.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKOR vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	98.81%	70.33%	-15.76%	-2.16%
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	41.50%	5.93%	8.52%	-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MKOR and GSG is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023	0.05

The correlation between MKOR and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MKOR vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKOR

MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 96
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

GSG

GSG Risk / Return Rank: 72
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKOR vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MKOR	GSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.19	2.24	+2.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.00	2.86	+2.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.40	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.46	5.72	+3.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	36.55	15.15	+21.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MKOR vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKOR Sharpe Ratio is 5.19, which is higher than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKOR and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MKOR	GSG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.19	2.24	+2.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	-0.09	+1.68

Drawdowns

MKOR vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKOR drawdown since its inception was -22.09%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKOR and GSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MKOR	GSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.09%	-89.62%	+67.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.62%	-9.46%	-11.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-57.28%	+55.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-63.72%	+57.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.34%	3.57%	+1.77%

Volatility

MKOR vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a higher volatility of 17.78% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 7.89%. This indicates that MKOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MKOR	GSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.78%	7.89%	+9.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.27%	20.41%	+12.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.13%	23.01%	+14.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.07%	22.61%	+4.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.07%	22.03%	+5.04%

MKOR vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MKOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MKOR vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

MKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	1.32%	2.62%	5.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MKOR and GSG in my portfolio?

MKOR and GSG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MKOR or GSG?

MKOR has higher volatility (17.78%) compared to GSG (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKOR dropped -22.09% vs GSG's -89.62%.

Which ETF is better, MKOR or GSG?

On 1-year performance, MKOR leads with 191.49% vs 51.06% for GSG. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MKOR or GSG?

Over the 1-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 191.49% return vs 51.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MKOR or GSG?

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MKOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MKOR or GSG?

MKOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

What is the main difference between MKOR and GSG?

MKOR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MKOR and 0.75% for GSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.