MKA.L vs. ERAS
MKA.L (Mkango Resources Ltd) and ERAS (Erasca, Inc.) are both stocks. MKA.L operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while ERAS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, MKA.L returned 57.41%/yr vs 65.23%/yr for ERAS. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MKA.L vs. ERAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MKA.L is traded in GBp, while ERAS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ERAS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKA.L achieves a -7.74% return, which is significantly lower than ERAS's 279.62% return.
MKA.L
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -7.74%
- 6M
- -17.50%
- 1Y
- 160.00%
- 3Y*
- 57.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ERAS
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 35.50%
- YTD
- 279.62%
- 6M
- 289.31%
- 1Y
- 832.87%
- 3Y*
- 65.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MKA.L vs. ERAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKA.L Mkango Resources Ltd | -7.74% | 484.91% | -30.87% | -6.12% | -60.48% | 21.57% |
ERAS Erasca, Inc. | 279.62% | 37.65% | 19.90% | -53.05% | -69.05% | -0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MKA.L and ERAS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | -0.01 |
Fundamentals
MKA.L:
£149.39M
ERAS:
$4.28B
MKA.L:
-$0.04
ERAS:
-$0.96
MKA.L:
$50.78K
ERAS:
$0.00
MKA.L:
-$544.15K
ERAS:
-$743.00K
MKA.L:
-$17.87M
ERAS:
-$279.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKA.L vs. ERAS — Risk / Return Rank
MKA.L
ERAS
MKA.L vs. ERAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MKA.L | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.71 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 14.14 | -11.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | 44.57 | -38.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MKA.L vs. ERAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKA.L drawdown since its inception was -88.80%, smaller than the maximum ERAS drawdown of -95.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKA.L and ERAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKA.L | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.80% | -95.46% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.45% | -59.49% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.06% | -68.68% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.83% | -40.42% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -73.14% | +30.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.50% | 18.91% | +6.59% |
Volatility
MKA.L vs. ERAS - Volatility Comparison
Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) has a higher volatility of 22.52% compared to Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) at 20.15%. This indicates that MKA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MKA.L | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.52% | 20.15% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.28% | 95.90% | -47.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.98% | 103.55% | -8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.51% | 82.88% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.26% | 82.88% | +13.38% |
Dividends
MKA.L vs. ERAS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MKA.L nor ERAS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MKA.L vs. ERAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mkango Resources Ltd and Erasca, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MKA.L and ERAS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MKA.L and ERAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer