PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIX.TO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than PFMN.TO's 1.49% return.


MIX.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.91%
YTD
8.17%
6M
7.84%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFMN.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.87%
YTD
1.49%
6M
2.01%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MIX.TO and PFMN.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIX.TO
MIX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MIX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MIX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PFMN.TO
PFMN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PFMN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFMN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFMN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PFMN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFMN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIX.TOPFMN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.16

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.26

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

4.31

+6.77

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the PFMN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIX.TO and PFMN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIX.TOPFMN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

0.94

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.53

0.79

+1.74

Drawdowns

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum PFMN.TO drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIX.TO and PFMN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIX.TOPFMN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-13.04%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-3.49%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.24%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-1.19%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.02%

+1.54%

Volatility

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) at 1.73%. This indicates that MIX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFMN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIX.TOPFMN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

1.73%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

3.56%

+6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

4.69%

+8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.63%

7.80%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

9.78%

+2.85%

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIX.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PFMN.TO's 4.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIX.TO vs. PFMN.TO - Dividend Comparison

MIX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than PFMN.TO's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MIX.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF
1.57%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFMN.TO
PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund
0.78%0.80%0.00%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIX.TO and PFMN.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIX.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIX.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 4.27% for PFMN.TO.

MIX.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while PFMN.TO is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Picton Mahoney. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for MIX.TO and 4.27% for PFMN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIX.TO and PFMN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer