PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MIX.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.91%
YTD
8.17%
6M
7.84%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CEQP.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
4.99%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MIX.TO and CEQP.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIX.TO
MIX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MIX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MIX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CEQP.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIX.TOCEQP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIX.TOCEQP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.53

1.37

+1.16

Drawdowns

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, which is greater than CEQP.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIX.TO and CEQP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIX.TOCEQP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-8.33%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-1.89%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

Volatility

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIX.TOCEQP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

16.40%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.63%

16.40%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

16.40%

-3.77%

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIX.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CEQP.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIX.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Dividend Comparison

MIX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than CEQP.TO's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025
CEQP.TO
CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF
0.01%0.00%
MIX.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF
1.57%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIX.TO and CEQP.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIX.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIX.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CEQP.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for MIX.TO and 0.30% for CEQP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIX.TO and CEQP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer