PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIVU.DE achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than QDVB.DE's 10.48% return.


MIVU.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.89%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.75%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*

QDVB.DE

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.28%
YTD
10.48%
6M
10.79%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MIVU.DE
Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF
4.05%-3.87%22.89%5.36%-4.28%31.88%-5.36%30.00%-5.89%
QDVB.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF
10.48%0.35%29.28%26.64%-16.49%39.07%5.34%37.19%-12.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MIVU.DE and QDVB.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2018

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between MIVU.DE and QDVB.DE has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIVU.DE
MIVU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVB.DE
QDVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QDVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIVU.DEQDVB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.32

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.32

12.21

-8.90

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the QDVB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIVU.DE and QDVB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIVU.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVB.DE drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVU.DE and QDVB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIVU.DEQDVB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-33.25%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-6.77%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.89%

-22.69%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.89%

-22.69%

+7.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-0.82%

-4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-5.02%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.84%

+0.13%

Volatility

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) have volatilities of 2.49% and 2.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIVU.DEQDVB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.49%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.25%

7.46%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

11.15%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

15.55%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

17.96%

-4.02%

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIVU.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVB.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MIVU.DE vs. QDVB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MIVU.DE nor QDVB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MIVU.DE and QDVB.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIVU.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIVU.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVB.DE.

MIVU.DE tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility, while QDVB.DE tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MIVU.DE and 0.20% for QDVB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIVU.DE and QDVB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer