PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD02.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIVO.L achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than UD02.L's 8.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MIVO.L has underperformed UD02.L with an annualized return of 5.55%, while UD02.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.


MIVO.L

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.50%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
5.55%

UD02.L

1D
0.76%
1M
2.18%
YTD
8.93%
6M
9.35%
1Y
14.57%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
5.11%17.54%6.50%8.50%-7.95%13.43%1.38%16.36%-13.89%8.90%
UD02.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
8.93%22.44%0.56%9.91%-9.99%11.20%-2.65%16.38%-5.80%18.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MIVO.L and UD02.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.82

The correlation between MIVO.L and UD02.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIVO.L
UD02.L

Financial Services

17.4%
22.8%

Industrials

16.0%
19.0%

Healthcare

13.3%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

13.1%
18.3%

Utilities

10.0%
18.7%

Communication Services

9.6%
8.6%

Energy

9.3%
2.2%

Basic Materials

3.6%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
1.4%

Technology

2.7%

-

Real Estate

1.4%
3.1%

Financial Services

MIVO.L
17.4%
UD02.L
22.8%

Industrials

MIVO.L
16.0%
UD02.L
19.0%

Healthcare

MIVO.L
13.3%
UD02.L
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

MIVO.L
13.1%
UD02.L
18.3%

Utilities

MIVO.L
10.0%
UD02.L
18.7%

Communication Services

MIVO.L
9.6%
UD02.L
8.6%

Energy

MIVO.L
9.3%
UD02.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

MIVO.L
3.6%
UD02.L
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MIVO.L
3.5%
UD02.L
1.4%

Technology

MIVO.L
2.7%
UD02.L

-

Real Estate

MIVO.L
1.4%
UD02.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIVO.L
MIVO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

UD02.L
UD02.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UD02.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD02.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD02.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UD02.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD02.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD02.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIVO.LUD02.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.41

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.25

4.14

-0.88

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the UD02.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIVO.L and UD02.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIVO.L drawdown since its inception was -24.30%, smaller than the maximum UD02.L drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVO.L and UD02.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIVO.LUD02.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-33.25%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-9.54%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.39%

-9.54%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.54%

-21.37%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.30%

-29.80%

+5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.16%

-2.11%

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-7.23%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.26%

-0.28%

Volatility

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) is 1.68%, while UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD02.L) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that MIVO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UD02.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIVO.LUD02.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

2.23%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

8.30%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.90%

9.94%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

12.43%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.62%

13.83%

-1.21%

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIVO.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than UD02.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Dividend Comparison

MIVO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD02.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UD02.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.26%3.03%4.76%2.56%2.38%2.25%2.16%2.80%2.65%1.92%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MIVO.L and UD02.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MIVO.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIVO.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD02.L.

MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD02.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for MIVO.L and 0.28% for UD02.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIVO.L and UD02.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer