MIVO.L vs. UD02.L
MIVO.L (Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS) and UD02.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both Europe Equities funds - MIVO.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while UD02.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MIVO.L returned 5.55%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for UD02.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIVO.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for UD02.L.
Performance
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIVO.L achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than UD02.L's 8.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MIVO.L has underperformed UD02.L with an annualized return of 5.55%, while UD02.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.
MIVO.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
UD02.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIVO.L Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS | 5.11% | 17.54% | 6.50% | 8.50% | -7.95% | 13.43% | 1.38% | 16.36% | -13.89% | 8.90% |
UD02.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 8.93% | 22.44% | 0.56% | 9.91% | -9.99% | 11.20% | -2.65% | 16.38% | -5.80% | 18.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIVO.L and UD02.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015 | 0.82 |
The correlation between MIVO.L and UD02.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Industrials
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Healthcare
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Consumer Defensive
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Utilities
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Communication Services
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Energy
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Basic Materials
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Consumer Cyclical
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Technology
MIVO.L
UD02.L
-
Real Estate
MIVO.L
UD02.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L — Risk / Return Rank
MIVO.L
UD02.L
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD02.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIVO.L | UD02.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.41 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | 4.14 | -0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIVO.L drawdown since its inception was -24.30%, smaller than the maximum UD02.L drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVO.L and UD02.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIVO.L | UD02.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -33.25% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.39% | -9.54% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.39% | -9.54% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.54% | -21.37% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.30% | -29.80% | +5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.16% | -2.11% | -2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -7.23% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.26% | -0.28% |
Volatility
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) is 1.68%, while UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD02.L) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that MIVO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UD02.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIVO.L | UD02.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 2.23% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.39% | 8.30% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.90% | 9.94% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 12.43% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 13.83% | -1.21% |
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIVO.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than UD02.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIVO.L vs. UD02.L - Dividend Comparison
MIVO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD02.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIVO.L Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UD02.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.26% | 3.03% | 4.76% | 2.56% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.16% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 1.92% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MIVO.L and UD02.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MIVO.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIVO.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD02.L.
MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD02.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for MIVO.L and 0.28% for UD02.L.
Find the right allocation for MIVO.L and UD02.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer