PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MIVO.L is traded in GBp, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIVO.L achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MIVO.L has underperformed ANXU.L with an annualized return of 7.53%, while ANXU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.69% annualized return.


MIVO.L

1D
0.44%
1M
0.62%
YTD
4.24%
6M
5.52%
1Y
7.85%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
7.53%

ANXU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
10.24%
YTD
20.95%
6M
19.24%
1Y
42.83%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
22.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
4.24%17.54%6.50%8.50%-7.95%13.43%1.38%16.36%-3.04%13.15%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
20.15%11.32%28.95%48.68%-25.30%28.68%41.33%36.74%4.00%20.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MIVO.L and ANXU.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2011

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between MIVO.L and ANXU.L has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIVO.L
ANXU.L

Financial Services

17.5%
0.2%

Industrials

15.5%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.3%
7.7%

Healthcare

13.1%
4.2%

Utilities

10.5%
1.4%

Energy

9.9%
0.6%

Communication Services

9.5%
15.8%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
12.2%

Technology

2.5%
53.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.1%

Financial Services

MIVO.L
17.5%
ANXU.L
0.2%

Industrials

MIVO.L
15.5%
ANXU.L
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

MIVO.L
13.3%
ANXU.L
7.7%

Healthcare

MIVO.L
13.1%
ANXU.L
4.2%

Utilities

MIVO.L
10.5%
ANXU.L
1.4%

Energy

MIVO.L
9.9%
ANXU.L
0.6%

Communication Services

MIVO.L
9.5%
ANXU.L
15.8%

Basic Materials

MIVO.L
3.6%
ANXU.L
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MIVO.L
3.3%
ANXU.L
12.2%

Technology

MIVO.L
2.5%
ANXU.L
53.7%

Real Estate

MIVO.L
1.5%
ANXU.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIVO.L
MIVO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIVO.LANXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.47

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

3.83

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.76

10.84

-8.08

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIVO.L and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIVO.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.68

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.96

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

1.23

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.30

-0.56

Drawdowns

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIVO.L drawdown since its inception was -24.30%, smaller than the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVO.L and ANXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIVO.LANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-27.52%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-11.12%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.38%

-24.28%

+15.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.54%

-27.52%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.30%

-27.52%

+3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

0.00%

-4.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-4.99%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.94%

-1.10%

Volatility

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) is 2.77%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that MIVO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIVO.LANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

5.02%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

11.74%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

15.89%

-6.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

20.08%

-9.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.25%

21.15%

-8.90%

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MIVO.L and ANXU.L have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MIVO.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MIVO.L nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MIVO.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIVO.L and ANXU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.

MIVO.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIVO.L and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer