MIVL vs. FPXI
MIVL (MFS Active International Value ETF) and FPXI (First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. MIVL is actively managed, while FPXI is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIVL charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FPXI.
Performance
MIVL vs. FPXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MIVL
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPXI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- 6M
- 18.47%
- YTD
- 25.65%
- 1Y
- 33.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.88%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
MIVL vs. FPXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MIVL MFS Active International Value ETF | 2.00% |
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | -6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIVL and FPXI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIVL vs. FPXI — Risk / Return Rank
MIVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FPXI
MIVL vs. FPXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active International Value ETF (MIVL) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIVL | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIVL vs. FPXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIVL drawdown since its inception was -2.49%, smaller than the maximum FPXI drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVL and FPXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIVL | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -55.78% | +53.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.12% | +14.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -20.12% | +19.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.05% | — |
Volatility
MIVL vs. FPXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIVL | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.09% | 28.76% | -14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 22.83% | -8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 21.70% | -7.61% |
MIVL vs. FPXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIVL has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FPXI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIVL vs. FPXI - Dividend Comparison
MIVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.63% | 0.70% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 1.13% | 0.71% | 0.18% | 0.67% | 1.75% | 0.75% | 2.09% | 1.34% |
MIVL MFS Active International Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIVL and FPXI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIVL is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIVL is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.
FPXI has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for MIVL.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MIVL and 0.70% for FPXI.
Find the right allocation for MIVL and FPXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer