MIUIX vs. ATOIX
MIUIX (MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund) and ATOIX (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MIUIX returned 1.47%/yr vs 2.30%/yr for ATOIX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIUIX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ATOIX.
Performance
MIUIX vs. ATOIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIUIX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than ATOIX's 1.01% return.
MIUIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 7.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ATOIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
MIUIX vs. ATOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIUIX MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund | 1.54% | 6.64% | 3.00% | 5.19% | -8.06% | -0.17% |
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 1.01% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 3.27% | 0.87% | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIUIX and ATOIX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIUIX vs. ATOIX — Risk / Return Rank
MIUIX
ATOIX
MIUIX vs. ATOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIUIX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 10.98 | -9.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 30.48 | -28.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 89.66 | -81.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIUIX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 3.50 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 2.80 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 2.47 | -2.03 |
Drawdowns
MIUIX vs. ATOIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIUIX drawdown since its inception was -12.91%, which is greater than ATOIX's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIUIX and ATOIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIUIX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -1.46% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -0.10% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.04% | -0.10% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.91% | -0.37% | -12.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | 0.00% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -0.06% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.03% | +0.90% |
Volatility
MIUIX vs. ATOIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) at 0.20%. This indicates that MIUIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIUIX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 0.20% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 0.61% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56% | 0.87% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.43% | 0.83% | +2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.43% | 0.79% | +2.64% |
MIUIX vs. ATOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIUIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ATOIX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIUIX vs. ATOIX - Dividend Comparison
MIUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than ATOIX's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 2.98% | 3.27% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 1.07% | 0.06% | 0.88% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 2.20% | 0.61% | 0.52% |
MIUIX MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund | 3.68% | 4.82% | 3.61% | 2.39% | 1.30% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIUIX and ATOIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MIUIX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to ATOIX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIUIX dropped -12.91% vs ATOIX's -1.46%.
ATOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIUIX and ATOIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer