MIUIX vs. FHMIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX).

MIUIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on May 11, 2021. FHMIX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Feb 2, 2021.

Performance

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MIUIX MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund	-0.70%	6.64%	3.00%	5.19%	-8.06%	-0.17%
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	0.42%	3.09%	1.19%	0.32%	0.00%	0.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIUIX achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than FHMIX's 0.42% return.

MIUIX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -3.05%
• YTD: -0.70%
• 6M: 0.99%
• 1Y: 4.68%
• 3Y*: 3.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FHMIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 2.71%
• 3Y*: 1.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIUIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FHMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.

MIUIX

MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund

FHMIX

Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund

Return for Risk

MIUIX vs. FHMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIUIX

MIUIX Risk / Return Rank: 71
MIUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MIUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MIUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MIUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MIUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FHMIX

FHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIUIX	FHMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	3.11	-1.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	9.83	-8.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	4.28	-2.90
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	14.95	-13.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	55.16	-49.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIUIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the FHMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIUIX and FHMIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIUIX	FHMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	3.11	-1.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	1.32	-1.01

Correlation

The correlation between MIUIX and FHMIX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Dividend Comparison

MIUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than FHMIX's 2.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MIUIX MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund	3.69%	4.82%	3.61%	2.39%	1.30%	0.64%
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	2.67%	3.04%	1.18%	0.32%	0.00%	0.02%

Drawdowns

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIUIX drawdown since its inception was -12.91%, which is greater than FHMIX's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIUIX and FHMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIUIX	FHMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.91%	-0.50%	-12.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.11%	-0.20%	-3.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-0.10%	-2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-0.07%	-4.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.05%	+0.98%

Volatility

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) at 0.10%. This indicates that MIUIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIUIX	FHMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	0.10%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.77%	0.63%	+1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.30%	0.96%	+3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.44%	0.78%	+2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.44%	0.78%	+2.66%