PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIUIX vs. FHMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIUIX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than FHMIX's 1.11% return.


MIUIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.97%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*

FHMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.37%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
1.86%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MIUIX
MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund
1.54%6.64%3.00%5.19%-8.06%-0.17%
FHMIX
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
1.11%3.09%1.19%0.32%0.00%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MIUIX and FHMIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.17

The correlation between MIUIX and FHMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIUIX vs. FHMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIUIX
MIUIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MIUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MIUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FHMIX
FHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIUIXFHMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

5.69

-3.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

28.50

-26.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

77.58

-69.89

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIUIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the FHMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIUIX and FHMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIUIXFHMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

3.19

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.45

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.44

-1.01

Drawdowns

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIUIX drawdown since its inception was -12.91%, which is greater than FHMIX's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIUIX and FHMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIUIXFHMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-0.50%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-0.10%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.04%

-0.50%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.91%

-0.50%

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

0.00%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-0.06%

-3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.04%

+0.89%

Volatility

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund (MIUIX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) at 0.21%. This indicates that MIUIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIUIXFHMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.21%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

0.56%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56%

0.89%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.43%

0.79%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

0.79%

+2.64%

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIUIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FHMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIUIX vs. FHMIX - Dividend Comparison

MIUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than FHMIX's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FHMIX
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
2.80%3.04%1.18%0.32%0.00%0.02%
MIUIX
MFS Municipal Intermediate Fund
3.68%4.82%3.61%2.39%1.30%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIUIX and FHMIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIUIX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to FHMIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIUIX dropped -12.91% vs FHMIX's -0.50%.

FHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIUIX and FHMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer