PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MITTX vs. MGWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MITTX vs. MGWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) and MFS Growth Allocation Fund (MGWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MITTX achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly higher than MGWIX's 6.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MITTX has outperformed MGWIX with an annualized return of 13.61%, while MGWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.


MITTX

1D
0.08%
1M
3.36%
YTD
8.10%
6M
8.84%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
13.61%

MGWIX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.80%
6M
7.27%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MITTX vs. MGWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
8.10%13.67%19.69%19.26%-16.27%26.73%18.72%31.92%-5.56%23.55%
MGWIX
MFS Growth Allocation Fund
6.80%13.63%10.71%14.86%-15.92%16.01%14.75%26.55%-5.59%19.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MITTX and MGWIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2002

0.95

The correlation between MITTX and MGWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MITTX vs. MGWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MITTX
MITTX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MITTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MITTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MGWIX
MGWIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MGWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MGWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MITTX vs. MGWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) and MFS Growth Allocation Fund (MGWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MITTXMGWIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.12

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

8.96

+0.47

MITTX vs. MGWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MITTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the MGWIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MITTX and MGWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MITTXMGWIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.74

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.56

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.76

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.60

-0.16

Drawdowns

MITTX vs. MGWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MITTX drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, roughly equal to the maximum MGWIX drawdown of -47.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MITTX and MGWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MITTXMGWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-47.83%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-7.33%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.10%

-12.30%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.27%

-23.39%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.45%

-29.09%

-4.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-5.36%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.73%

+0.51%

Volatility

MITTX vs. MGWIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) and MFS Growth Allocation Fund (MGWIX) have volatilities of 2.44% and 2.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MITTXMGWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.44%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

7.02%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

8.96%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

12.13%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

12.85%

+4.36%

MITTX vs. MGWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MITTX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MGWIX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

MITTX vs. MGWIX - Dividend Comparison

MITTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.25%, more than MGWIX's 7.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGWIX
MFS Growth Allocation Fund
7.72%8.24%6.24%3.84%4.83%7.28%3.79%5.00%6.89%5.04%3.11%5.08%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
13.25%14.33%14.47%10.96%9.35%8.66%8.14%7.58%13.49%7.27%5.55%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MITTX and MGWIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGWIX has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to MITTX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MITTX dropped -49.54% vs MGWIX's -47.83%.

MITTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MITTX and MGWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer