PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MITSY vs. HESAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MITSY vs. HESAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY) and Hermes International SA (HESAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MITSY achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly higher than HESAY's -20.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MITSY having a 18.81% annualized return and HESAY not far ahead at 19.56%.


MITSY

1D
-2.40%
1M
-22.13%
YTD
3.00%
6M
3.13%
1Y
48.76%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
21.77%
10Y*
18.81%

HESAY

1D
1.27%
1M
7.58%
YTD
-20.12%
6M
-20.92%
1Y
-24.62%
3Y*
-1.83%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
19.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MITSY vs. HESAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MITSY
Mitsui & Company Ltd
3.00%43.31%13.10%28.00%23.12%28.70%4.06%14.13%-4.90%20.93%
HESAY
Hermes International SA
-20.12%4.83%13.70%38.27%-11.23%63.06%44.39%37.55%4.07%32.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MITSY and HESAY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2011

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MITSY:

$86.00B

HESAY:

$205.94B

EPS

MITSY:

¥5.90K

HESAY:

€8.67

PE Ratio

MITSY:

16.41

HESAY:

19.54

PEG Ratio

MITSY:

4.74

HESAY:

1.17

PS Ratio

MITSY:

0.98

HESAY:

5.72

PB Ratio

MITSY:

1.56

HESAY:

9.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

MITSY:

¥14.19T

HESAY:

€31.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MITSY:

¥1.35T

HESAY:

€22.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

MITSY:

¥1.01T

HESAY:

€15.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MITSY vs. HESAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MITSY
MITSY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MITSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITSY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MITSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITSY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HESAY
HESAY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HESAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HESAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HESAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HESAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
HESAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MITSY vs. HESAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY) and Hermes International SA (HESAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MITSYHESAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.87

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

-0.74

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

-1.32

+8.37

MITSY vs. HESAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MITSY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the HESAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MITSY and HESAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MITSY vs. HESAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MITSY drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, roughly equal to the maximum HESAY drawdown of -45.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MITSY and HESAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MITSYHESAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-45.60%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.50%

-36.48%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.95%

-38.23%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

-45.60%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

-45.60%

+11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.90%

-33.22%

+7.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.07%

-10.86%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

20.32%

-13.61%

Volatility

MITSY vs. HESAY - Volatility Comparison

Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Hermes International SA (HESAY) at 7.31%. This indicates that MITSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HESAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MITSYHESAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

7.31%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.95%

23.41%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.84%

30.47%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.74%

31.54%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.76%

27.98%

-1.22%

Dividends

MITSY vs. HESAY - Dividend Comparison

MITSY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HESAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HESAY
Hermes International SA
1.07%1.18%1.13%0.67%0.57%0.31%0.46%0.68%0.91%1.55%1.81%2.54%
MITSY
Mitsui & Company Ltd
0.00%1.17%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.65%3.82%0.00%

Financials

MITSY vs. HESAY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsui & Company Ltd and Hermes International SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T20222023202420252026
3.71T
7.91B
(MITSY) Total Revenue
(HESAY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MITSY values in JPY, HESAY values in EUR

MITSY vs. HESAY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mitsui & Company Ltd and Hermes International SA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
9.9%
71.6%
Portfolio components
MITSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported a gross profit of 368.30B and revenue of 3.71T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.9%.

HESAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hermes International SA reported a gross profit of 5.66B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.

MITSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported an operating income of 106.13B and revenue of 3.71T, resulting in an operating margin of 2.9%.

HESAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hermes International SA reported an operating income of 3.91B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.5%.

MITSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported a net income of 226.10B and revenue of 3.71T, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

HESAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hermes International SA reported a net income of 2.26B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 28.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MITSY and HESAY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MITSY has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to HESAY (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MITSY dropped -44.45% vs HESAY's -45.60%.

MITSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MITSY and HESAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer