MITEY vs. 1109.HK

Last updated Jun 19, 2026

MITEY (Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR) and 1109.HK (China Resources Land Ltd) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — MITEY in Real Estate - Diversified, 1109.HK in Real Estate - Development. Over the past 10 years, MITEY returned 3.59%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for 1109.HK. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MITEY vs. 1109.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR (MITEY) and China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MITEY is traded in USD, while 1109.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1109.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MITEY achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than 1109.HK's 20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, MITEY has underperformed 1109.HK with an annualized return of 3.59%, while 1109.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.

MITEY

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 5.53%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 35.26%
• 3Y*: 27.60%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: 3.59%

1109.HK

• 1D: -7.32%
• 1M: -6.45%
• YTD: 20.76%
• 6M: 21.09%
• 1Y: 22.88%
• 3Y*: 2.66%
• 5Y*: 3.93%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MITEY vs. 1109.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MITEY Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR	5.53%	75.68%	2.54%	6.05%	-6.79%	-14.36%	-15.17%	21.80%	-9.70%	-13.10%
1109.HK China Resources Land Ltd	20.76%	26.99%	-14.09%	-17.76%	14.63%	6.48%	-14.00%	34.68%	34.84%	35.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MITEY and 1109.HK is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007	0.13

Return for Risk

MITEY vs. 1109.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MITEY

MITEY Risk / Return Rank: 69
MITEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MITEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MITEY Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MITEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
MITEY Martin Ratio Rank: 68

1109.HK

1109.HK Risk / Return Rank: 64
1109.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
1109.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
1109.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 58
1109.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
1109.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MITEY vs. 1109.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR (MITEY) and China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MITEY	1109.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	0.75	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.31	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.15	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	1.32	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.19	2.66	+0.53

MITEY vs. 1109.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MITEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the 1109.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MITEY and 1109.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MITEY vs. 1109.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MITEY drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than 1109.HK's maximum drawdown of -70.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MITEY and 1109.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	MITEY	1109.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.31%	-70.00%	-26.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.07%	-17.67%	-11.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.39%	-43.98%	+11.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.74%	-46.25%	+12.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.73%	-46.25%	+0.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.56%	-13.96%	-77.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.06%	-20.75%	-60.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.07%	8.75%	+2.32%

Volatility

MITEY vs. 1109.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR (MITEY) is 9.34%, while China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK) has a volatility of 10.18%. This indicates that MITEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1109.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MITEY	1109.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.34%	10.18%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.36%	24.10%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.79%	31.20%	+1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.39%	41.63%	-13.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.20%	37.80%	-9.60%

Dividends

MITEY vs. 1109.HK - Dividend Comparison

MITEY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 1109.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1109.HK China Resources Land Ltd	4.14%	5.29%	7.03%	5.75%	4.73%	4.63%	3.73%	3.24%	3.31%	3.10%	3.32%	2.20%
MITEY Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd ADR	0.00%	0.63%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.83%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MITEY and 1109.HK in my portfolio?

MITEY and 1109.HK have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.