1109.HK vs. 1908.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

1109.HK (China Resources Land Ltd) and 1908.HK (C&D International Investment Group Ltd) are both stocks. Both operate in the Real Estate - Development industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, 1109.HK returned 11.34%/yr vs 28.05%/yr for 1908.HK. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1109.HK vs. 1908.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK) and C&D International Investment Group Ltd (1908.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1109.HK achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than 1908.HK's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, 1109.HK has underperformed 1908.HK with an annualized return of 11.34%, while 1908.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 28.05% annualized return.

1109.HK

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 32.28%
• 6M: 21.31%
• 1Y: 44.83%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 5.58%
• 10Y*: 11.34%

1908.HK

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 3.74%
• YTD: 6.73%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 13.31%
• 3Y*: 1.28%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 28.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1109.HK vs. 1908.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1109.HK China Resources Land Ltd	32.28%	27.21%	-14.57%	-17.77%	14.83%	7.07%	-14.42%	33.98%	35.16%	36.06%
1908.HK C&D International Investment Group Ltd	6.73%	30.36%	-15.37%	-21.68%	48.15%	46.80%	101.63%	53.51%	0.28%	37.31%

Correlation

The correlation between 1109.HK and 1908.HK is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2012	0.37

The correlation between 1109.HK and 1908.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

1109.HK vs. 1908.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1109.HK

1109.HK Risk / Return Rank: 81
1109.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
1109.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
1109.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 77
1109.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
1109.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 78

1908.HK

1908.HK Risk / Return Rank: 52
1908.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
1908.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
1908.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 48
1908.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
1908.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1109.HK vs. 1908.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK) and C&D International Investment Group Ltd (1908.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1109.HK	1908.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	0.43	+1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	0.90	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.10	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	0.47	+2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.99	1.02	+4.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1109.HK vs. 1908.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1109.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the 1908.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1109.HK and 1908.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1109.HK	1908.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	0.43	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.23	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.70	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.74	-0.53

Drawdowns

1109.HK vs. 1908.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1109.HK drawdown since its inception was -90.82%, which is greater than 1908.HK's maximum drawdown of -65.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1109.HK and 1908.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	1109.HK	1908.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.82%	-65.28%	-25.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.67%	-33.28%	+15.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.00%	-50.48%	+6.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.50%	-57.16%	+10.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.50%	-57.16%	+10.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.30%	-23.99%	+17.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.30%	-26.50%	-8.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.50%	15.09%	-6.59%

Volatility

1109.HK vs. 1908.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Resources Land Ltd (1109.HK) is 11.28%, while C&D International Investment Group Ltd (1908.HK) has a volatility of 14.47%. This indicates that 1109.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1908.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1109.HK	1908.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.28%	14.47%	-3.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.24%	27.20%	-3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.66%	36.19%	-5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.15%	47.52%	-5.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.41%	41.82%	-3.41%

Dividends

1109.HK vs. 1908.HK - Dividend Comparison

1109.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than 1908.HK's 5.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1109.HK China Resources Land Ltd	4.00%	5.29%	7.03%	5.75%	4.73%	4.63%	3.73%	3.24%	3.31%	3.10%	3.32%	2.20%
1908.HK C&D International Investment Group Ltd	5.71%	7.67%	9.95%	7.81%	5.27%	6.69%	14.56%	13.30%	4.49%	1.45%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1109.HK and 1908.HK in my portfolio?

1109.HK and 1908.HK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.