PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MISL vs. NATO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MISL vs. NATO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than NATO's 1.39% return.


MISL

1D
-2.71%
1M
5.48%
YTD
7.59%
6M
13.84%
1Y
32.38%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
10Y*

NATO

1D
-1.87%
1M
2.05%
YTD
1.39%
6M
7.82%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MISL vs. NATO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
7.59%41.24%-5.15%
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
1.39%50.95%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MISL and NATO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024

0.80

The correlation between MISL and NATO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MISL vs. NATO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISL
MISL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MISL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MISL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISL Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NATO
NATO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISL vs. NATO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MISLNATODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.13

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.85

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

2.19

+3.30

MISL vs. NATO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISL Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the NATO Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISL and NATO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MISLNATODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.65

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Drawdowns

MISL vs. NATO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, which is greater than NATO's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and NATO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MISLNATODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-15.99%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-15.99%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.75%

-12.30%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-3.71%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

6.17%

-0.26%

Volatility

MISL vs. NATO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) at 7.97%. This indicates that MISL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NATO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MISLNATODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

7.97%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.14%

17.65%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.60%

20.71%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

22.61%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

22.61%

-3.47%

MISL vs. NATO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NATO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MISL vs. NATO - Dividend Comparison

MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than NATO's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.36%0.40%0.74%0.63%0.08%
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
0.44%0.45%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MISL and NATO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MISL has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to NATO (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISL dropped -17.91% vs NATO's -15.99%.

On 1-year performance, MISL leads with 32.38% vs 13.50% for NATO. On fees, NATO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NATO has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MISL has performed better with a 32.38% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NATO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for MISL.

NATO has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.36% for MISL.

MISL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while NATO is Aerospace & Defense. MISL tracks Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while NATO tracks Solactive Transatlantic Aerospace and Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MISL and 0.35% for NATO.

MISL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MISL and NATO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer