PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MISGX vs. PNSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MISGX vs. PNSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISGX achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than PNSAX's 19.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MISGX has underperformed PNSAX with an annualized return of 8.75%, while PNSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.


MISGX

1D
-1.19%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.63%
6M
2.55%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
8.75%

PNSAX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.68%
YTD
19.11%
6M
15.58%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
15.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MISGX vs. PNSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MISGX
Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund
2.63%-1.28%13.89%14.02%-24.63%8.55%27.78%18.96%0.40%22.83%
PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
19.11%8.91%22.98%22.87%-28.10%14.38%47.65%37.60%-2.46%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MISGX and PNSAX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2013

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between MISGX and PNSAX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MISGX vs. PNSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISGX
MISGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PNSAX
PNSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PNSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PNSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISGX vs. PNSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MISGXPNSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

2.20

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.53

7.69

-5.16

MISGX vs. PNSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the PNSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISGX and PNSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MISGXPNSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.36

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.42

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.67

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Drawdowns

MISGX vs. PNSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISGX drawdown since its inception was -41.11%, smaller than the maximum PNSAX drawdown of -69.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISGX and PNSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MISGXPNSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.11%

-69.47%

+28.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-14.00%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-26.25%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.70%

-38.77%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.11%

-38.77%

-2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.37%

-1.63%

-8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.29%

-23.55%

+12.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

3.99%

+0.28%

Volatility

MISGX vs. PNSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX) is 6.04%, while Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that MISGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MISGXPNSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

8.08%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

18.25%

-5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

22.60%

-5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.36%

23.23%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

23.58%

-2.35%

MISGX vs. PNSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISGX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than PNSAX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

MISGX vs. PNSAX - Dividend Comparison

MISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than PNSAX's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MISGX
Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund
7.69%7.89%3.76%0.00%14.39%33.08%1.96%5.78%12.50%4.18%0.00%1.62%
PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
0.36%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.27%4.87%1.93%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MISGX and PNSAX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNSAX has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to MISGX (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISGX dropped -41.11% vs PNSAX's -69.47%.

PNSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MISGX and PNSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer