MINT vs. FDVV

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. MINT is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MINT returned 3.50%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for FDVV. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINT charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

MINT vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 9.83% return.

MINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

FDVV

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 9.83%
• 6M: 10.02%
• 1Y: 24.53%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 13.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.94%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	1.62%	3.34%	1.72%	1.86%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	9.83%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT and FDVV is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.05

Return for Risk

MINT vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 76
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MINT	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	17.39	2.45	+14.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	66.22	3.42	+62.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	21.40	1.45	+19.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	94.29	2.65	+91.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	954.48	10.98	+943.50

MINT vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT Sharpe Ratio is 17.39, which is higher than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MINT vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINT	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-40.25%	+35.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.05%	-9.30%	+9.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.16%	-15.90%	+15.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.42%	-20.18%	+17.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-4.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-3.80%	+3.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	2.24%	-2.24%

Volatility

MINT vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) is 0.09%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MINT	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	3.08%	-2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.20%	8.17%	-7.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27%	10.07%	-9.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.58%	14.77%	-14.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.95%	16.98%	-16.03%

MINT vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINT has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MINT vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than FDVV's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.68%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MINT and FDVV in my portfolio?

MINT and FDVV have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MINT or FDVV?

FDVV has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINT dropped -4.62% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, MINT or FDVV?

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.83% vs 3.50% for MINT. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MINT or FDVV?

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 3.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MINT or FDVV?

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MINT or FDVV?

MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.68% for FDVV.

What is the main difference between MINT and FDVV?

MINT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MINT and 0.29% for FDVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.39 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.