PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MINT.TO (Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF) and HXDM.TO (Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) are both International Equity funds. MINT.TO is actively managed, while HXDM.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MINT.TO returned 12.51%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for HXDM.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF (MINT.TO) and Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT.TO achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than HXDM.TO's 12.68% return.

MINT.TO

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.05%
6M
7.53%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
—

HXDM.TO

1D
0.32%
1M
0.52%
6M
7.52%
YTD
12.68%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MINT.TO
Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF		11.34%23.42%10.91%18.04%-3.59%17.69%0.55%21.99%-10.35%
HXDM.TO
Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF		12.68%24.06%11.07%15.09%-8.78%10.16%4.59%15.19%-8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT.TO and HXDM.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2018

0.41

Over the past year, MINT.TO and HXDM.TO have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF

Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with HXDM.TO:
HXDM.TO vs. HXS.TOHXDM.TO vs. XEF.TOHXDM.TO vs. HXEM.TOHXDM.TO vs. QDXH.TOHXDM.TO vs. XEQT.TOHXDM.TO vs. VXM.TOHXDM.TO vs. VIU.TO

Return for Risk

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MINT.TO
MINT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MINT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO
HXDM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HXDM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXDM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF (MINT.TO) and Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MINT.TOHXDM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.86
1.57

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.74
2.23

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.15

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

8.14

+2.36

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the HXDM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT.TO and HXDM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.97%, which is greater than HXDM.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT.TO and HXDM.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MINT.TOHXDM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.97%

-28.43%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-11.40%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-14.65%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.04%

-23.87%

+5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-2.34%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-4.78%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.00%

-0.63%

Volatility

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF (MINT.TO) and Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MINT.TOHXDM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.99%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

13.45%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

15.64%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

14.25%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

15.43%

+1.20%

Dividends

MINT.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Dividend Comparison

MINT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while HXDM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXDM.TO
Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MINT.TO
Manulife Multifactor Developed International Index ETF		2.86%5.86%2.14%2.81%2.84%2.55%1.60%2.70%2.76%1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

MINT.TO and HXDM.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINT.TO and HXDM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer