MINT.L vs. PR1T.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

MINT.L (PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and PR1T.L (Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) are both exchange-traded funds - MINT.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while PR1T.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. MINT.L is actively managed, while PR1T.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MINT.L returned 3.48%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for PR1T.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MINT.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1T.L.

Performance

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT.L achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than PR1T.L's 1.86% return.

MINT.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 2.11%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.52%
• 3Y*: 5.21%
• 5Y*: 3.48%
• 10Y*: 2.65%

PR1T.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 1.72%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: 4.59%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MINT.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.37%	4.66%	5.75%	5.72%	-0.67%	-0.09%	0.17%
PR1T.L Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)	1.86%	4.23%	5.21%	4.82%	0.61%	0.09%	-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MINT.L and PR1T.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2020	0.21

The correlation between MINT.L and PR1T.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT.L

MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PR1T.L

PR1T.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PR1T.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PR1T.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PR1T.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PR1T.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MINT.L	PR1T.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.81	9.52	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	16.76	26.09	-9.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.53	10.62	-7.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	45.23	44.35	+0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	230.58	405.40	-174.82

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINT.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.81, which is comparable to the PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio of 9.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT.L and PR1T.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT.L drawdown since its inception was -3.89%, which is greater than PR1T.L's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT.L and PR1T.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINT.L	PR1T.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-0.56%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-0.08%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.62%	-0.08%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.47%	-0.56%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-3.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	0.00%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.05%	-0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	0.01%	+0.01%

Volatility

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (MINT.L) is 0.14%, while Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) has a volatility of 0.18%. This indicates that MINT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PR1T.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MINT.L	PR1T.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	0.18%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.36%	0.29%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58%	0.40%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.76%	0.45%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.95%	0.43%	+0.52%

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINT.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1T.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

MINT.L vs. PR1T.L - Dividend Comparison

MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while PR1T.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT.L PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	4.01%	4.43%	5.18%	4.81%	1.51%	0.34%	1.17%	2.63%	2.33%	1.56%	1.31%	0.79%
PR1T.L Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MINT.L and PR1T.L in my portfolio?

MINT.L and PR1T.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MINT.L or PR1T.L?

On fees, PR1T.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MINT.L or PR1T.L?

PR1T.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINT.L.

What is the main difference between MINT.L and PR1T.L?

MINT.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while PR1T.L is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MINT.L and 0.05% for PR1T.L.