MINO vs. BOND
MINO (PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MINO is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while BOND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MINO returned 4.99%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for BOND. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MINO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BOND.
Performance
MINO vs. BOND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINO achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's 0.48% return.
MINO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOND
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
MINO vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.96% | 4.42% | 3.13% | 8.46% | -10.43% | 0.28% |
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 0.48% | 8.39% | 2.77% | 6.48% | -14.57% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINO and BOND is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MINO and BOND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINO vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank
MINO
BOND
MINO vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINO | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.31 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.23 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 7.13 | +4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINO | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 1.70 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.63 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
MINO vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINO drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum BOND drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINO and BOND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINO | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.24% | -19.71% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -3.01% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.34% | -6.12% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -1.57% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -3.50% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.94% | -0.27% |
Volatility
MINO vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINO) is 1.04%, while PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that MINO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINO | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 1.40% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.90% | 2.88% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73% | 3.97% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 5.76% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 5.09% | -0.54% |
MINO vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINO vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison
MINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than BOND's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.19% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 3.89% | 3.71% | 3.91% | 3.78% | 2.87% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINO and BOND have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOND has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to MINO (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINO dropped -15.24% vs BOND's -19.71%.
On 3-year performance, BOND leads with 4.99% vs 4.99% for MINO. On fees, MINO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MINO has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BOND has performed better with a 4.99% return vs 4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MINO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BOND.
BOND has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 3.89% for MINO.
MINO is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BOND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MINO and 0.54% for BOND.
MINO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MINO and BOND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer