PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINJX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINJX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class R6 (MINJX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINJX achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than RWIIX's 10.10% return.


MINJX

1D
0.62%
1M
3.72%
YTD
7.29%
6M
9.32%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
10.44%

RWIIX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.63%
YTD
10.10%
6M
12.82%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINJX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MINJX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class R6
7.29%33.23%7.45%18.18%-22.97%10.67%20.57%26.01%-8.90%0.65%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
10.10%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MINJX and RWIIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017

0.57

The correlation between MINJX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINJX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINJX
MINJX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MINJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINJX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MINJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINJX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINJX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class R6 (MINJX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINJXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.41

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

9.13

-3.14

MINJX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINJX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINJXRWIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.14

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.16

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.38

0.00

Drawdowns

MINJX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINJX drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINJX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINJXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.23%

-20.34%

-39.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-6.94%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-20.34%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.01%

-20.34%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

0.00%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-7.82%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.59%

+0.84%

Volatility

MINJX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class R6 (MINJX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) at 3.55%. This indicates that MINJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINJXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

3.55%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

8.34%

+2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

11.06%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

11.53%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

10.91%

+4.75%

MINJX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINJX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINJX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

MINJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, which matches RWIIX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINJX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class R6
7.99%8.58%13.14%12.16%14.96%7.71%5.62%4.23%4.84%2.85%2.02%3.43%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
7.93%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINJX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINJX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to RWIIX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINJX dropped -60.23% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINJX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer