MINDX vs. ETGIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MINDX (Matthews India Fund) and ETGIX (Eaton Vance Greater India Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MINDX returned 5.53%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for ETGIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MINDX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for ETGIX.

Performance

MINDX vs. ETGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews India Fund (MINDX) and Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MINDX having a -12.84% return and ETGIX slightly lower at -13.00%. Over the past 10 years, MINDX has underperformed ETGIX with an annualized return of 5.53%, while ETGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.13% annualized return.

MINDX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: -12.84%
• 6M: -12.27%
• 1Y: -9.91%
• 3Y*: 3.98%
• 5Y*: 3.02%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

ETGIX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: -13.00%
• 6M: -12.25%
• 1Y: -14.36%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: 1.99%
• 10Y*: 7.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINDX vs. ETGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MINDX Matthews India Fund	-12.84%	1.61%	9.99%	23.14%	-9.87%	17.87%	16.46%	-0.79%	-9.80%	33.76%
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund	-13.00%	-2.06%	17.55%	20.60%	-19.86%	25.74%	17.64%	10.52%	-12.14%	44.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MINDX and ETGIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2005	0.92

The correlation between MINDX and ETGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MINDX vs. ETGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINDX

MINDX Risk / Return Rank: 1
MINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

ETGIX

ETGIX Risk / Return Rank: 0
ETGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
ETGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
ETGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
ETGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ETGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINDX vs. ETGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews India Fund (MINDX) and Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MINDX	ETGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	-1.09	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.93	-1.54	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.83	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	-0.69	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-1.60	+0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MINDX vs. ETGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is higher than the ETGIX Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINDX and ETGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MINDX	ETGIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.70	-1.09	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.13	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.41	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.26	+0.14

Drawdowns

MINDX vs. ETGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINDX drawdown since its inception was -72.18%, roughly equal to the maximum ETGIX drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINDX and ETGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MINDX	ETGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.18%	-73.62%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.96%	-22.03%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.51%	-27.22%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.51%	-29.84%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.46%	-42.71%	-5.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.40%	-22.84%	+2.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-26.86%	+11.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.53%	9.50%	-0.97%

Volatility

MINDX vs. ETGIX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews India Fund (MINDX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) at 4.72%. This indicates that MINDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MINDX	ETGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	4.72%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	12.09%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	13.99%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	15.10%	+0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	17.64%	-0.21%

MINDX vs. ETGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINDX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ETGIX's 1.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

MINDX vs. ETGIX - Dividend Comparison

MINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, less than ETGIX's 16.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund	16.63%	14.47%	4.07%	4.85%	21.62%	8.60%	0.24%	2.79%	1.17%	3.32%	0.56%	0.79%
MINDX Matthews India Fund	7.76%	6.76%	15.03%	3.07%	15.30%	9.87%	3.03%	12.04%	16.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MINDX and ETGIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MINDX and ETGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MINDX or ETGIX?

MINDX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to ETGIX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINDX dropped -72.18% vs ETGIX's -73.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.