PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIND vs. QUIK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MIND vs. QUIK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) and QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIND achieves a -42.78% return, which is significantly lower than QUIK's 122.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MIND has underperformed QUIK with an annualized return of -16.73%, while QUIK has yielded a comparatively higher 0.29% annualized return.


MIND

1D
1.00%
1M
5.67%
6M
-42.12%
YTD
-42.78%
1Y
-43.74%
3Y*
-8.19%
5Y*
-23.74%
10Y*
-16.73%
ALL TIME*
-5.37%

QUIK

1D
2.21%
1M
-16.35%
6M
81.08%
YTD
122.96%
1Y
117.18%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
20.98%
10Y*
0.29%
ALL TIME*
-9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$417.61K$432.83K$610.12K
$3.71M$4.36M$9.71M

MIND vs. QUIK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIND
MIND Technology, Inc.
-42.78%10.71%20.49%43.29%-72.76%-24.63%-21.95%12.11%-19.24%-23.61%
QUIK
QuickLogic Corporation
122.96%-46.81%-18.47%169.65%0.59%34.83%-36.83%-41.61%-57.82%25.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MIND and QUIK is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 1999

0.15

The correlation between MIND and QUIK shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MIND:

$45.72M

QUIK:

$237.50M

EPS

MIND:

$0.15

QUIK:

-$0.89

PS Ratio

MIND:

1.32

QUIK:

15.47

PB Ratio

MIND:

1.10

QUIK:

9.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

MIND:

$33.05M

QUIK:

$14.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MIND:

$18.78M

QUIK:

$3.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

MIND:

$3.51M

QUIK:

-$7.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIND vs. QUIK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIND
MIND Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIND Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIND Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QUIK
QUIK Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QUIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUIK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QUIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUIK Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIND vs. QUIK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) and QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MINDQUIKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.26

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

2.36

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

6.64

-7.70

MIND vs. QUIK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIND Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the QUIK Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIND and QUIK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIND vs. QUIK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIND drawdown since its inception was -99.04%, roughly equal to the maximum QUIK drawdown of -99.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIND and QUIK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINDQUIKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.04%

-99.59%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.04%

-49.87%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.04%

-76.85%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.69%

-76.85%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.63%

-93.28%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.47%

-97.53%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.18%

-91.63%

+18.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.38%

17.71%

+23.67%

Volatility

MIND vs. QUIK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MIND Technology, Inc. (MIND) is 17.52%, while QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) has a volatility of 22.45%. This indicates that MIND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUIK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINDQUIKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.52%

22.45%

-4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.67%

66.16%

-10.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.89%

84.62%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.81%

69.36%

+14.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.07%

78.17%

-0.10%

Dividends

MIND vs. QUIK - Dividend Comparison

Neither MIND nor QUIK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MIND vs. QUIK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MIND Technology, Inc. and QuickLogic Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MIND and QUIK have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUIK has higher volatility (22.45%) compared to MIND (17.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIND dropped -99.04% vs QUIK's -99.59%.

QUIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIND and QUIK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer