PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MILN vs. QCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MILN vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MILN vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
-13.38%4.63%27.11%36.27%-38.55%-3.39%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
-6.67%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MILN achieves a -13.38% return, which is significantly lower than QCLR's -6.67% return.


MILN

1D
3.07%
1M
-6.49%
YTD
-13.38%
6M
-17.66%
1Y
-5.48%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*

QCLR

1D
1.60%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-6.67%
6M
-5.86%
1Y
10.57%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MILN vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MILN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MILN vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MILN
MILN Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MILN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MILN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MILN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MILN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MILN Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MILN vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MILNQCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.25

0.91

-1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.21

1.35

-1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.17

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

1.06

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.64

4.33

-4.97

MILN vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MILN Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MILN and QCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MILNQCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

0.91

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.53

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between MILN and QCLR is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MILN vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

MILN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than QCLR's 15.95% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
0.29%0.25%0.22%0.33%0.24%0.15%0.21%0.43%0.43%0.89%0.32%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
15.95%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MILN vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MILN drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILN and QCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MILNQCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.40%

-21.77%

-22.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.32%

-10.22%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.69%

-8.78%

-10.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-6.32%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.06%

2.50%

+5.56%

Volatility

MILN vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.86%. This indicates that MILN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MILNQCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

3.86%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

8.53%

+4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.03%

12.06%

+9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.67%

12.61%

+10.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

12.61%

+9.42%