MILN vs. DBO
MILN (Global X Millennial Consumer ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MILN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Indxx Millennials Thematic Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MILN returned 11.39%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for DBO. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MILN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
MILN vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MILN achieves a -4.03% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MILN has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 11.39%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
MILN
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -4.03%
- 1Y
- -4.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.84%
DBO
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 24.59%
- 6M
- 53.46%
- YTD
- 76.48%
- 1Y
- 60.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.01M | $10.23M | $13.95M | |
| $318.17K | $312.98K | $344.80K |
MILN vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MILN Global X Millennial Consumer ETF | -4.03% | 4.63% | 27.11% | 36.27% | -38.55% | 13.99% | 44.77% | 32.24% | 2.57% | 24.48% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 76.48% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -15.22% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between MILN and DBO is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between MILN and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MILN vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
MILN
DBO
MILN vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MILN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.25 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 2.01 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 6.09 | -6.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MILN vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MILN drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILN and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MILN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -90.18% | +45.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.32% | -27.73% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.48% | -28.20% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.40% | -37.68% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.40% | -61.69% | +17.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.01% | -53.56% | +42.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -62.20% | +51.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.23% | 9.96% | +1.27% |
Volatility
MILN vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is 5.73%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that MILN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MILN | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 17.75% | -12.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 33.77% | -19.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 38.53% | -20.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 33.35% | -10.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 32.20% | -10.12% |
MILN vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MILN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
MILN vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
MILN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than DBO's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.99% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MILN Global X Millennial Consumer ETF | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.24% | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.43% | 0.89% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MILN and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to MILN (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MILN dropped -44.40% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 12.59% vs 11.39% for MILN. On fees, MILN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MILN has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MILN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.31% for MILN.
MILN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. MILN tracks Indxx Millennials Thematic Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MILN and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MILN and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer