MILK vs. IGCB
MILK (Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF) and IGCB (TCW Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - MILK tracks the Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index while IGCB tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MILK returned 9.23% vs 5.37% for IGCB. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MILK charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IGCB.
Performance
MILK vs. IGCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MILK achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than IGCB's 0.08% return.
MILK
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 9.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGCB
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MILK vs. IGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF | 2.18% | 7.49% | -0.35% |
IGCB TCW Corporate Bond ETF | 0.08% | 8.42% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MILK and IGCB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MILK and IGCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MILK vs. IGCB — Risk / Return Rank
MILK
IGCB
MILK vs. IGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MILK | IGCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 1.85 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.90 | 5.69 | +3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MILK | IGCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.38 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 1.09 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
MILK vs. IGCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MILK drawdown since its inception was -6.16%, which is greater than IGCB's maximum drawdown of -4.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILK and IGCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MILK | IGCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -4.20% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.75% | -2.91% | -0.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -1.31% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -0.93% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.95% | +0.09% |
Volatility
MILK vs. IGCB - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) at 1.35%. This indicates that MILK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MILK | IGCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.35% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.78% | 2.78% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.21% | 3.92% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 4.82% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 4.82% | +1.87% |
MILK vs. IGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MILK has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGCB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MILK vs. IGCB - Dividend Comparison
MILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than IGCB's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IGCB TCW Corporate Bond ETF | 4.75% | 4.52% | 0.66% |
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF | 7.04% | 6.97% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MILK and IGCB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MILK has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to IGCB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MILK dropped -6.16% vs IGCB's -4.20%.
On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 9.23% vs 5.37% for IGCB. On fees, IGCB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IGCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 5.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGCB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.
MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 4.75% for IGCB.
MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index, while IGCB tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MILK and 0.35% for IGCB.
MILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MILK and IGCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer