PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIIBX vs. TSDLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIIBX vs. TSDLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) and T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund (TSDLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIIBX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than TSDLX's 1.24% return.


MIIBX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.26%
YTD
-0.26%
1Y
1.51%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
1.31%
ALL TIME*
2.69%

TSDLX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.32%
6M
0.96%
YTD
1.24%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MIIBX vs. TSDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MIIBX
Madison High Quality Bond Fund
-0.26%6.21%2.74%4.55%-7.13%-1.76%0.14%
TSDLX
T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund
1.24%7.65%10.89%9.91%-5.69%0.77%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MIIBX and TSDLX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020

0.70

The correlation between MIIBX and TSDLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIIBX vs. TSDLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIIBX
MIIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MIIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MIIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

TSDLX
TSDLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TSDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIIBX vs. TSDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) and T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund (TSDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIIBXTSDLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.60

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.33

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.16

13.83

-10.68

MIIBX vs. TSDLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIIBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the TSDLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIIBX and TSDLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIIBX vs. TSDLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIIBX drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, which is greater than TSDLX's maximum drawdown of -7.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIIBX and TSDLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIIBXTSDLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-7.86%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-1.26%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.33%

-1.26%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.53%

-7.86%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.42%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-1.47%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.30%

+0.39%

Volatility

MIIBX vs. TSDLX - Volatility Comparison

Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund (TSDLX) at 0.42%. This indicates that MIIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIIBXTSDLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.42%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

1.39%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

1.85%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.54%

2.46%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.78%

2.33%

+0.45%

MIIBX vs. TSDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIIBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDLX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIIBX vs. TSDLX - Dividend Comparison

MIIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than TSDLX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIIBX
Madison High Quality Bond Fund
3.57%3.34%3.02%2.17%1.23%1.54%1.28%1.87%1.73%1.41%1.23%1.35%
TSDLX
T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund
4.65%6.06%9.64%7.72%1.82%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIIBX and TSDLX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIIBX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to TSDLX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIIBX dropped -11.12% vs TSDLX's -7.86%.

TSDLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIIBX and TSDLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer