PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIIAX vs. SCOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIIAX vs. SCOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIIAX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCOAX's -0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MIIAX has underperformed SCOAX with an annualized return of 1.08%, while SCOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.61% annualized return.


MIIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-0.83%
YTD
-0.56%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
-0.64%
10Y*
1.08%
ALL TIME*
3.22%

SCOAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.96%
YTD
-0.72%
1Y
1.84%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
-0.86%
10Y*
1.61%
ALL TIME*
1.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MIIAX vs. SCOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIIAX
Praxis Impact Bond Fund
-0.56%6.82%1.17%5.32%-13.09%-2.22%7.45%7.75%-0.36%3.11%
SCOAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.72%7.56%0.82%5.44%-14.84%-1.49%9.49%9.59%0.11%5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MIIAX and SCOAX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 1999

0.92

The correlation between MIIAX and SCOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIIAX vs. SCOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIIAX
MIIAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MIIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MIIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SCOAX
SCOAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SCOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SCOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIIAX vs. SCOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIIAXSCOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.14

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

1.03

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

2.52

-0.27

MIIAX vs. SCOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the SCOAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIIAX and SCOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIIAX vs. SCOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIIAX drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum SCOAX drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIIAX and SCOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIIAXSCOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-20.12%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-3.06%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.12%

-5.95%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-19.90%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.76%

-20.12%

+1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

-4.77%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-5.45%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.25%

-0.02%

Volatility

MIIAX vs. SCOAX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX) at 0.93%. This indicates that MIIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIIAXSCOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

0.93%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

3.06%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

3.93%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.85%

6.37%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

5.23%

-0.49%

MIIAX vs. SCOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIIAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SCOAX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIIAX vs. SCOAX - Dividend Comparison

MIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SCOAX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIIAX
Praxis Impact Bond Fund
3.15%3.28%3.12%2.35%2.02%1.50%2.42%2.15%2.27%2.19%2.35%2.55%
SCOAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund
3.96%4.19%3.57%2.98%2.11%1.69%6.04%4.24%3.16%3.67%3.79%4.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MIIAX and SCOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIIAX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to SCOAX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIIAX dropped -18.76% vs SCOAX's -20.12%.

SCOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIIAX and SCOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer