MIIAX vs. PCIFX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MIIAX (Praxis Impact Bond Fund) and PCIFX (PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, MIIAX returned 1.15%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for PCIFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIIAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PCIFX.

Performance

MIIAX vs. PCIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments (PCIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIIAX achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly lower than PCIFX's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MIIAX has underperformed PCIFX with an annualized return of 1.15%, while PCIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.

MIIAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: -0.34%
• YTD: -0.03%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 3.90%
• 5Y*: -0.44%
• 10Y*: 1.15%

PCIFX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.04%
• 6M: 0.33%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: 5.71%
• 5Y*: 0.74%
• 10Y*: 1.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIIAX vs. PCIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIIAX Praxis Impact Bond Fund	-0.03%	6.82%	1.17%	5.32%	-13.09%	-2.22%	7.45%	7.75%	-0.36%	3.11%
PCIFX PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments	0.52%	7.03%	3.84%	7.82%	-13.38%	-1.83%	8.04%	8.66%	-0.86%	3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MIIAX and PCIFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 1999	0.90

The correlation between MIIAX and PCIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MIIAX vs. PCIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIIAX

MIIAX Risk / Return Rank: 18
MIIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MIIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MIIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MIIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MIIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

PCIFX

PCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 32
PCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIIAX vs. PCIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments (PCIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIIAX	PCIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.14	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	1.76	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.21	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	1.87	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.10	5.59	-2.50

MIIAX vs. PCIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the PCIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIIAX and PCIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIIAX vs. PCIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIIAX drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PCIFX drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIIAX and PCIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIIAX	PCIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.76%	-18.54%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-2.30%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.20%	-5.34%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.22%	-18.16%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.76%	-18.54%	-0.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.58%	-0.98%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-1.89%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	0.76%	+0.35%

Volatility

MIIAX vs. PCIFX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments (PCIFX) at 1.02%. This indicates that MIIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIIAX	PCIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	1.02%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	2.70%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	3.76%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.84%	5.80%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.73%	4.71%	+0.02%

MIIAX vs. PCIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIIAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PCIFX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIIAX vs. PCIFX - Dividend Comparison

MIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than PCIFX's 5.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MIIAX Praxis Impact Bond Fund	3.42%	3.28%	3.12%	2.35%	2.02%	1.50%	2.42%	2.15%	2.27%	2.19%	2.35%	2.55%
PCIFX PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments	5.44%	5.04%	6.03%	5.50%	2.79%	2.93%	4.46%	2.61%	2.70%	1.99%	1.86%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIIAX and PCIFX in my portfolio?

MIIAX and PCIFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIIAX or PCIFX?

MIIAX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to PCIFX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIIAX dropped -18.76% vs PCIFX's -18.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.