PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIIAX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIIAX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIIAX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MIIAX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.29%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.00% annualized return.


MIIAX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.82%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.52%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
1.29%

FTHRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.26%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIIAX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIIAX
Praxis Impact Bond Fund
0.43%6.82%1.17%5.32%-13.09%-2.22%7.45%7.75%-0.36%3.11%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.04%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MIIAX and FTHRX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 1999

0.87

The correlation between MIIAX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIIAX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIIAX
MIIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MIIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MIIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIIAX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIIAXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.73

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.38

4.83

-0.45

MIIAX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIIAX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIIAX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIIAX drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIIAX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIIAXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-19.01%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-2.11%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-2.68%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-13.18%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.76%

-13.25%

-5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.13%

-1.28%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-3.06%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.75%

+0.31%

Volatility

MIIAX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.89%. This indicates that MIIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIIAXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.89%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.08%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76%

2.78%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

4.03%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

3.40%

+1.33%

MIIAX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIIAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIIAX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

MIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than FTHRX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.70%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%
MIIAX
Praxis Impact Bond Fund
3.38%3.28%3.12%2.35%2.02%1.50%2.42%2.15%2.27%2.19%2.35%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIIAX and FTHRX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIIAX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to FTHRX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIIAX dropped -18.76% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIIAX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer