PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIFIX vs. FHMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIFIX vs. FHMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) and Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIFIX achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than FHMFX's 0.75% return.


MIFIX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.59%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.37%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
5.13%

FHMFX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.96%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.16%
1Y
5.71%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIFIX vs. FHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MIFIX
Miller Intermediate Bond Fund
4.56%7.11%7.31%6.88%-7.72%4.32%14.22%9.79%-5.09%
FHMFX
Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund
0.75%8.18%3.13%9.11%-17.03%-1.41%10.15%14.45%-0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MIFIX and FHMFX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.18

Over the past year, MIFIX and FHMFX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIFIX vs. FHMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIFIX
MIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FHMFX
FHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIFIX vs. FHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) and Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIFIXFHMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.24

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

1.77

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

5.68

+8.91

MIFIX vs. FHMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIFIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the FHMFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIFIX and FHMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIFIX vs. FHMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIFIX drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum FHMFX drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIFIX and FHMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIFIXFHMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-22.95%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-3.24%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.39%

-6.45%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.87%

-22.95%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.96%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-6.28%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

1.01%

-0.34%

Volatility

MIFIX vs. FHMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) is 1.12%, while Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that MIFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIFIXFHMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.35%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

3.25%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

4.31%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

6.70%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

6.50%

-1.08%

MIFIX vs. FHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIFIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FHMFX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIFIX vs. FHMFX - Dividend Comparison

MIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than FHMFX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHMFX
Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund
4.83%4.70%4.52%4.07%2.65%2.42%3.05%3.90%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MIFIX
Miller Intermediate Bond Fund
4.41%4.59%4.08%3.60%3.62%5.87%5.16%2.36%5.16%3.90%1.48%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIFIX and FHMFX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHMFX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to MIFIX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIFIX dropped -15.58% vs FHMFX's -22.95%.

MIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIFIX and FHMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer