PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MIDD.L (iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF) and LGUK.L (L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - MIDD.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while LGUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIDD.L returned 3.14%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for LGUK.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIDD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUK.L.

Performance

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDD.L achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly higher than LGUK.L's 3.73% return.

MIDD.L

1D
0.56%
1M
4.32%
YTD
5.26%
6M
7.17%
1Y
13.79%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.54%

LGUK.L

1D
-1.06%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
3.73%
6M
8.03%
1Y
17.97%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MIDD.L
iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF		5.26%12.44%7.33%7.76%-17.86%16.27%-5.34%28.46%-8.04%
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF		3.73%24.95%10.56%6.64%5.26%17.94%-12.15%20.11%-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDD.L and LGUK.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018

0.68

The correlation between MIDD.L and LGUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MIDD.L
LGUK.L

Industrials

19.9%
14.7%

Financial Services

19.5%
25.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
3.7%

Real Estate

9.4%
0.6%

Technology

9.2%
0.7%

Basic Materials

6.6%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
14.5%

Communication Services

5.9%
2.5%

Healthcare

4.4%
14.7%

Utilities

3.0%
5.5%

Energy

2.5%
12.1%

Industrials

MIDD.L
19.9%
LGUK.L
14.7%

Financial Services

MIDD.L
19.5%
LGUK.L
25.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDD.L
13.3%
LGUK.L
3.7%

Real Estate

MIDD.L
9.4%
LGUK.L
0.6%

Technology

MIDD.L
9.2%
LGUK.L
0.7%

Basic Materials

MIDD.L
6.6%
LGUK.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

MIDD.L
6.1%
LGUK.L
14.5%

Communication Services

MIDD.L
5.9%
LGUK.L
2.5%

Healthcare

MIDD.L
4.4%
LGUK.L
14.7%

Utilities

MIDD.L
3.0%
LGUK.L
5.5%

Energy

MIDD.L
2.5%
LGUK.L
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF

L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF

Often compared with MIDD.L:
MIDD.L vs. VMID.LMIDD.L vs. CSUK.LMIDD.L vs. CUKS.LMIDD.L vs. ISF.LMIDD.L vs. HMWO.LMIDD.L vs. SWDA.LMIDD.L vs. FTAL.L
Often compared with LGUK.L:
LGUK.L vs. LCUK.LLGUK.L vs. VUGLGUK.L vs. S100.LLGUK.L vs. XASX.LLGUK.L vs. VUKG.LLGUK.L vs. SPYLGUK.L vs. ISF.L

Return for Risk

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MIDD.L
MIDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MIDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
LGUK.L
LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MIDD.LLGUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.10
1.24

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.67
1.84

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.92

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

6.51

-2.32

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDD.L and LGUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MIDD.LLGUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.24

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.82

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.52

-0.05

Drawdowns

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDD.L drawdown since its inception was -51.66%, which is greater than LGUK.L's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDD.L and LGUK.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MIDD.LLGUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.66%

-33.76%

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-9.30%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-12.30%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.93%

-12.30%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.60%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-5.71%

+4.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-4.82%

-3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.75%

+0.53%

Volatility

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (MIDD.L) is 3.92%, while L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that MIDD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MIDD.LLGUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

4.30%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

12.53%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

14.42%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

13.86%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.31%

+0.23%

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIDD.L vs. LGUK.L - Dividend Comparison

MIDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while LGUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MIDD.L
iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF		3.43%3.56%3.05%3.17%2.76%2.01%1.51%2.72%3.07%2.80%2.67%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

MIDD.L and LGUK.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MIDD.L.

MIDD.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while LGUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MIDD.L and 0.05% for LGUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDD.L and LGUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer