MID vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MID (American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. MID is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. MID charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

MID vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MID

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -2.00%
• 6M: 1.56%
• YTD: 2.51%
• 1Y: 1.83%
• 3Y*: 11.74%
• 5Y*: 2.57%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.07%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF	$78.49K	$249.03K	$206.22K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MID vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF	5.32%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

MID vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MID	QQQN
Technology	33.9%	47.3%
Industrials	20.5%	8.7%
Healthcare	12.8%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	13.7%
Energy	7.6%	-
Communication Services	4.5%	5.5%
Utilities	3.2%	1.6%
Financial Services	2.7%	-
Basic Materials	2.4%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	1.4%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

MID vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MID

MID Risk / Return Rank: 12
MID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MID Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MID Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MID Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MID Martin Ratio Rank: 12

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MID vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MID	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.26	—	—

Drawdowns

MID vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MID drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MID and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MID	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.15%	0.00%	-40.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	0.00%	-4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.15%	0.00%	-13.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MID	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.75%	0.00%	+17.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.72%	0.00%	+23.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.80%	0.00%	+23.80%

MID vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MID has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MID vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

MID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.17%	0.02%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MID or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MID or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MID or QQQN?

MID has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between MID and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MID and 0.18% for QQQN.