MIBX.L vs. UD03.L
MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) and UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both Europe Equities funds - MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR while UD03.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIBX.L returned 19.80%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for UD03.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIBX.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for UD03.L.
Performance
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIBX.L achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly higher than UD03.L's 12.28% return.
MIBX.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 28.91%
- 5Y*
- 19.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
UD03.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 13.44% | 43.78% | 13.17% | 30.61% | -3.53% | 18.16% | 1.49% | 1.66% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 12.28% | 25.20% | 0.78% | 19.24% | -4.62% | 10.81% | 5.72% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIBX.L and UD03.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, MIBX.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Utilities
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Industrials
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Consumer Cyclical
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Energy
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Technology
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Healthcare
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Communication Services
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Basic Materials
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Consumer Defensive
MIBX.L
UD03.L
Real Estate
MIBX.L
UD03.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank
MIBX.L
UD03.L
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIBX.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.61 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 5.70 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 16.25 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIBX.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 3.47 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 1.75 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.19 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIBX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than UD03.L's maximum drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIBX.L and UD03.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIBX.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -30.85% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -9.80% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -11.72% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.05% | -18.67% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.19% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -3.31% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.56% | -0.72% |
Volatility
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that MIBX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIBX.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 3.58% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 16.13% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 27.46% | -9.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 47.29% | -28.13% |
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIBX.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIBX.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison
MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than UD03.L's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 3.25% | 3.68% | 3.93% | 3.72% | 3.89% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 4.02% | 4.05% | 2.75% | 3.56% | 3.05% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIBX.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.
MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MIBX.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.
Find the right allocation for MIBX.L and UD03.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer