MIBX.L vs. ^IBEX
MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) is Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while ^IBEX (IBEX 35 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, MIBX.L returned 16.09%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for ^IBEX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MIBX.L vs. ^IBEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MIBX.L is traded in GBp, while ^IBEX is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ^IBEX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIBX.L achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly higher than ^IBEX's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MIBX.L has outperformed ^IBEX with an annualized return of 16.09%, while ^IBEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.
MIBX.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 28.91%
- 5Y*
- 19.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
^IBEX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
MIBX.L vs. ^IBEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 13.44% | 43.78% | 13.17% | 30.61% | -3.53% | 18.16% | 1.49% | 25.15% | -12.72% | 21.14% |
^IBEX IBEX 35 Index | 4.77% | 57.26% | 9.56% | 20.31% | -0.39% | 1.23% | -10.67% | 5.47% | -14.13% | 11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIBX.L and ^IBEX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MIBX.L and ^IBEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIBX.L vs. ^IBEX — Risk / Return Rank
MIBX.L
^IBEX
MIBX.L vs. ^IBEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) and IBEX 35 Index (^IBEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIBX.L | ^IBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.08 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 9.94 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIBX.L | ^IBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.03 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.89 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.46 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.10 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
MIBX.L vs. ^IBEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIBX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum ^IBEX drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIBX.L and ^IBEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIBX.L | ^IBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -59.52% | +24.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -10.44% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -10.44% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.05% | -20.57% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | -42.73% | +7.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -2.32% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -27.01% | +19.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.27% | -0.43% |
Volatility
MIBX.L vs. ^IBEX - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) and IBEX 35 Index (^IBEX) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIBX.L | ^IBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.35% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 13.23% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 15.83% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 16.61% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 18.36% | +0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIBX.L and ^IBEX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MIBX.L and ^IBEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer