^IBEX vs. CLPAX
^IBEX (IBEX 35 Index) is an index, while CLPAX (Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund) is Derivative Income fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, ^IBEX returned 7.52%/yr vs 7.84%/yr for CLPAX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
^IBEX vs. CLPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
^IBEX is traded in EUR, while CLPAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLPAX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^IBEX achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than CLPAX's 18.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ^IBEX having a 7.52% annualized return and CLPAX not far ahead at 7.84%.
^IBEX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
CLPAX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 10.46%
- YTD
- 18.82%
- 6M
- 13.35%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
^IBEX vs. CLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^IBEX IBEX 35 Index | 5.02% | 49.27% | 14.78% | 22.76% | -5.56% | 7.93% | -15.45% | 11.82% | -14.97% | 7.40% |
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund | 18.82% | -1.01% | 18.78% | 31.85% | -26.24% | 21.57% | -3.43% | 22.11% | 0.87% | -5.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^IBEX and CLPAX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2014 | 0.28 |
The correlation between ^IBEX and CLPAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^IBEX vs. CLPAX — Risk / Return Rank
^IBEX
CLPAX
^IBEX vs. CLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IBEX 35 Index (^IBEX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ^IBEX | CLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 1.98 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.64 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.37 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 5.54 | +4.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ^IBEX | CLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.98 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.66 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.51 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
^IBEX vs. CLPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^IBEX drawdown since its inception was -62.65%, which is greater than CLPAX's maximum drawdown of -30.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IBEX and CLPAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^IBEX | CLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.65% | -30.09% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -11.79% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.60% | -24.79% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -28.66% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.16% | -28.66% | -16.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | 0.00% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.32% | -9.81% | -18.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 5.04% | -2.14% |
Volatility
^IBEX vs. CLPAX - Volatility Comparison
IBEX 35 Index (^IBEX) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) at 4.25%. This indicates that ^IBEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^IBEX | CLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 4.25% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 10.00% | +3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 14.12% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 16.32% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 15.39% | +3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^IBEX and CLPAX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^IBEX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to CLPAX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^IBEX dropped -62.65% vs CLPAX's -30.09%.
CLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^IBEX and CLPAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer