PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIAGX vs. MINIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIAGX vs. MINIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIAGX achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than MINIX's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MIAGX has outperformed MINIX with an annualized return of 11.10%, while MINIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.33% annualized return.


MIAGX

1D
0.40%
1M
2.87%
YTD
8.26%
6M
8.90%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
11.10%

MINIX

1D
0.63%
1M
3.72%
YTD
7.26%
6M
9.26%
1Y
21.11%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIAGX vs. MINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIAGX
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund
8.26%15.20%12.11%16.29%-16.94%19.16%15.81%29.98%-6.72%23.23%
MINIX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I
7.26%33.06%7.35%18.04%-23.05%10.55%20.45%25.90%-9.02%27.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MIAGX and MINIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2002

0.82

The correlation between MIAGX and MINIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIAGX vs. MINIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIAGX
MIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MINIX
MINIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MINIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MINIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIAGX vs. MINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIAGXMINIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.65

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

5.95

+2.75

MIAGX vs. MINIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the MINIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIAGX and MINIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIAGXMINIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.48

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.49

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.66

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.57

-0.05

Drawdowns

MIAGX vs. MINIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIAGX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than MINIX's maximum drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIAGX and MINIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIAGXMINIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-51.72%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-12.42%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.88%

-13.59%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.51%

-36.78%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.78%

-36.78%

+4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.31%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-8.61%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.43%

-1.37%

Volatility

MIAGX vs. MINIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) is 2.81%, while MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that MIAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIAGXMINIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

4.06%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.38%

10.98%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

13.87%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

16.62%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

15.62%

-0.16%

MIAGX vs. MINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIAGX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MINIX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIAGX vs. MINIX - Dividend Comparison

MIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, which matches MINIX's 7.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIAGX
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund
7.22%7.82%5.16%3.41%4.49%6.84%3.69%4.80%6.06%4.25%3.12%5.45%
MINIX
MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I
7.24%7.77%12.02%11.21%13.90%7.25%5.25%3.94%4.49%2.62%1.82%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIAGX and MINIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINIX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to MIAGX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIAGX dropped -55.00% vs MINIX's -51.72%.

MIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIAGX and MINIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer