PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIAGX vs. MEIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIAGX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIAGX achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than MEIKX's 4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MIAGX has outperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 11.03%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


MIAGX

1D
-0.65%
1M
1.72%
YTD
7.55%
6M
7.87%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
11.03%

MEIKX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
4.09%
6M
5.41%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIAGX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIAGX
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund
7.55%15.20%12.11%16.29%-16.94%19.16%15.81%29.98%-6.72%23.23%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.09%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MIAGX and MEIKX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.90

The correlation between MIAGX and MEIKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIAGX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIAGX
MIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIAGX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIAGXMEIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.87

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

6.48

+1.73

MIAGX vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIAGX and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIAGXMEIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.22

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.56

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.61

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.40

+0.12

Drawdowns

MIAGX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIAGX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIAGX and MEIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIAGXMEIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-56.81%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-6.76%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.88%

-13.15%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.51%

-17.50%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.78%

-36.68%

+3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-2.20%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-9.45%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.95%

+0.11%

Volatility

MIAGX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 2.24%. This indicates that MIAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIAGXMEIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.24%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

7.70%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

10.38%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

13.91%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

16.55%

-1.09%

MIAGX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIAGX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIAGX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

MIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, less than MEIKX's 9.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.54%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
MIAGX
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund
7.27%7.82%5.16%3.41%4.49%6.84%3.69%4.80%6.06%4.25%3.12%5.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIAGX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIAGX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to MEIKX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIAGX dropped -55.00% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.

MIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIAGX and MEIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer