PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIAGX vs. MEIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIAGX vs. MEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIAGX achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than MEIIX's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MIAGX has outperformed MEIIX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while MEIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.


MIAGX

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.30%
YTD
8.26%
6M
7.37%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
11.50%

MEIIX

1D
0.38%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6.89%
6M
6.07%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIAGX vs. MEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIAGX
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund
8.26%15.20%12.11%16.29%-16.94%19.16%15.81%29.98%-6.72%23.23%
MEIIX
MFS Value Fund Class I
6.89%13.26%11.86%8.21%-6.02%25.43%3.99%30.04%-9.90%17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MIAGX and MEIIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2002

0.90

The correlation between MIAGX and MEIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIAGX vs. MEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIAGX
MIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIIX
MEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIAGX vs. MEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIAGXMEIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.44

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

8.41

+0.08

MIAGX vs. MEIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the MEIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIAGX and MEIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIAGX vs. MEIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIAGX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MEIIX drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIAGX and MEIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIAGXMEIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-52.64%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-6.76%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.88%

-13.19%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.51%

-17.58%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.78%

-36.70%

+3.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.05%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-6.54%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.96%

+0.11%

Volatility

MIAGX vs. MEIIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to MFS Value Fund Class I (MEIIX) at 3.22%. This indicates that MIAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIAGXMEIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

3.22%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

7.89%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

10.66%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

13.93%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

16.57%

-1.09%

MIAGX vs. MEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIAGX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIAGX vs. MEIIX - Dividend Comparison

MIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, less than MEIIX's 9.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIIX
MFS Value Fund Class I
9.09%9.52%9.30%8.41%7.58%3.32%2.63%3.17%3.62%4.04%2.91%5.97%
MIAGX
MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund
7.22%7.82%5.16%3.41%4.49%6.84%3.69%4.80%6.06%4.25%3.12%5.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIAGX and MEIIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIAGX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to MEIIX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIAGX dropped -55.00% vs MEIIX's -52.64%.

MIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIAGX and MEIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer