MIAGX vs. MDIJX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MIAGX (MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund) and MDIJX (MFS International Diversification Fund) are both mutual funds - MIAGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by MFS, while MDIJX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, MIAGX returned 10.92%/yr vs 9.74%/yr for MDIJX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MIAGX charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for MDIJX.

Performance

MIAGX vs. MDIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIAGX achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than MDIJX's 11.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MIAGX has outperformed MDIJX with an annualized return of 10.92%, while MDIJX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.74% annualized return.

MIAGX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 6.19%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 1Y: 16.47%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 10.92%
• ALL TIME*: 9.08%

MDIJX

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: 1.88%
• 6M: 5.93%
• YTD: 11.35%
• 1Y: 22.92%
• 3Y*: 15.16%
• 5Y*: 7.69%
• 10Y*: 9.74%
• ALL TIME*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MDIJX MFS International Diversification Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MIAGX MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MIAGX vs. MDIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIAGX MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund	9.49%	15.20%	12.11%	16.29%	-16.94%	19.16%	15.81%	29.98%	-6.72%	23.23%
MDIJX MFS International Diversification Fund	11.35%	27.84%	6.41%	14.37%	-17.12%	7.69%	15.26%	26.00%	-11.05%	30.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MIAGX and MDIJX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004	0.88

The correlation between MIAGX and MDIJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MIAGX vs. MDIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIAGX

MIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
MIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
MIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MDIJX

MDIJX Risk / Return Rank: 61
MDIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
MDIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MDIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MDIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MDIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIAGX vs. MDIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIAGX	MDIJX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.56	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.19	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.85	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.97	6.94	+0.04

MIAGX vs. MDIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the MDIJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIAGX and MDIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIAGX vs. MDIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIAGX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MDIJX drawdown of -56.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIAGX and MDIJX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIAGX	MDIJX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.00%	-56.60%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-11.40%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.88%	-12.57%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.51%	-30.19%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.78%	-30.19%	-2.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	0.00%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-9.04%	+2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	3.04%	-0.96%

Volatility

MIAGX vs. MDIJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) is 2.73%, while MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that MIAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIAGX	MDIJX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	4.13%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	11.70%	-2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.40%	13.59%	-2.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	14.42%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.38%	14.54%	+0.84%

MIAGX vs. MDIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIAGX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MDIJX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIAGX vs. MDIJX - Dividend Comparison

MIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, more than MDIJX's 4.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDIJX MFS International Diversification Fund	4.64%	5.17%	3.50%	4.14%	2.64%	2.70%	1.64%	2.50%	3.14%	1.63%	2.18%	1.69%
MIAGX MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund	7.14%	7.82%	5.16%	3.41%	4.49%	6.84%	3.69%	4.80%	6.06%	4.25%	3.12%	5.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIAGX and MDIJX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, MIAGX and MDIJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MIAGX or MDIJX?

MDIJX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to MIAGX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIAGX dropped -55.00% vs MDIJX's -56.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.