PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHITX vs. PRCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHITX vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS High Income Fund (MHITX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHITX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than PRCPX's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MHITX has underperformed PRCPX with an annualized return of 4.44%, while PRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.56% annualized return.


MHITX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.52%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
2.98%
10Y*
4.44%

PRCPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.79%
6M
3.27%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHITX vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHITX
MFS High Income Fund
0.99%8.72%5.56%11.12%-11.60%3.20%4.49%14.48%-3.28%6.20%
PRCPX
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund
1.79%11.51%9.36%14.90%-10.50%6.36%5.55%13.77%-1.44%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MHITX and PRCPX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014

0.74

The correlation between MHITX and PRCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHITX vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHITX
MHITX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MHITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHITX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MHITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHITX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCPX
PRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHITX vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS High Income Fund (MHITX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHITXPRCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.78

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

5.10

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

24.42

-11.83

MHITX vs. PRCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the PRCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHITX and PRCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHITXPRCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

3.08

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.19

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

1.21

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.88

-0.27

Drawdowns

MHITX vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHITX drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHITX and PRCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHITXPRCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.76%

-23.07%

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-1.99%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.88%

-3.83%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-14.34%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.29%

-23.07%

+3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-3.12%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.41%

+0.12%

Volatility

MHITX vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison

MFS High Income Fund (MHITX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHITXPRCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.90%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

2.39%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

3.29%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.43%

4.81%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.63%

5.45%

+0.18%

MHITX vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHITX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHITX vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison

MHITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, less than PRCPX's 9.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MHITX
MFS High Income Fund
6.22%6.04%5.07%4.68%4.07%4.34%4.49%4.65%5.06%4.85%5.39%6.36%
PRCPX
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund
9.27%9.32%8.77%7.88%4.89%5.11%5.36%5.18%5.72%4.95%5.88%7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHITX and PRCPX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRCPX has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to MHITX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHITX dropped -46.76% vs PRCPX's -23.07%.

PRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHITX and PRCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer