MHIP vs. FBTU.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MHIP (Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF) and FBTU.L (First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MHIP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FBTU.L.

Performance

MHIP vs. FBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP) and First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MHIP

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 0.71%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBTU.L

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 9.87%
• 6M: 17.18%
• YTD: 19.33%
• 1Y: 52.72%
• 3Y*: 16.89%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHIP vs. FBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MHIP Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF	0.14%
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating	19.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MHIP and FBTU.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026	0.45

Return for Risk

MHIP vs. FBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHIP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBTU.L

FBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
FBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHIP vs. FBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP) and First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MHIP	FBTU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.19	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.05	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.65	—

Drawdowns

MHIP vs. FBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHIP drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, smaller than the maximum FBTU.L drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHIP and FBTU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MHIP	FBTU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.09%	-33.73%	+30.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.47%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-8.60%	+7.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	-12.80%	+11.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MHIP	FBTU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	23.95%	-12.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.54%	21.52%	-9.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.54%	21.70%	-10.16%

MHIP vs. FBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHIP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTU.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MHIP vs. FBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MHIP nor FBTU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MHIP and FBTU.L in my portfolio?

MHIP and FBTU.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MHIP or FBTU.L?

On fees, MHIP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MHIP or FBTU.L?

MHIP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FBTU.L.

What is the main difference between MHIP and FBTU.L?

They also come from different issuers: Milliman and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MHIP and 0.60% for FBTU.L.