PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHGVY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MHGVY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mowi ASA ADR (MHGVY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHGVY achieves a -15.15% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MHGVY has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 5.78%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.


MHGVY

1D
-4.25%
1M
-6.74%
YTD
-15.15%
6M
-12.76%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
-2.86%
10Y*
5.78%

^GSPC

1D
-2.64%
1M
0.25%
YTD
7.86%
6M
7.47%
1Y
24.32%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHGVY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHGVY
Mowi ASA ADR
-15.15%45.61%-1.26%9.21%-25.55%9.21%-14.38%29.60%32.75%1.45%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.86%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MHGVY and ^GSPC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHGVY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHGVY
MHGVY Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MHGVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHGVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHGVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MHGVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHGVY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHGVY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mowi ASA ADR (MHGVY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHGVY^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.36

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.69

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

12.34

-10.53

MHGVY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHGVY Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHGVY and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHGVY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.01

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.70

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.74

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.47

-0.18

Drawdowns

MHGVY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHGVY drawdown since its inception was -56.35%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHGVY and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHGVY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.35%

-56.78%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.68%

-9.10%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-18.90%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.35%

-25.43%

-30.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.35%

-33.92%

-22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.35%

-2.97%

-17.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-10.72%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.20%

1.97%

+4.23%

Volatility

MHGVY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Mowi ASA ADR (MHGVY) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.82%. This indicates that MHGVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHGVY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

3.82%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.82%

9.41%

+8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

12.20%

+10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.57%

16.93%

+11.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.20%

18.08%

+12.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHGVY and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHGVY has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to ^GSPC (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHGVY dropped -56.35% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHGVY and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer